UMESH C.BANERJEE, BARIN GHOSH
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Appellant
Versus
KANTI TARAFDAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against an order of Ajoy Nath Ray, J. dated 7th March, 1994 passed on a writ petition, where a writ of mandamus had been sought for release of the goods seized by the Customs Authorities and a writ of certiorary was prayed for quashing the show cause notice on the ground that the show cause notice was received by the writ petitioners after expiry of six months from the date of seizure.
( 2 ) BY the order the learned Judge directed the Appellants, Customs authorities, to return the seized goods to be respondents, writ, petitioners, within four weeks from the date of the order, and further directed that the show cause notice may be proceeded with, but only after return of the seized goods. The order further provided that the writ petitioners will be entitled to a hearing as provided by law and the proceedings shall be contained if, at all, in accordance with law and the writ petitioners will be entitled, if aggrieved, to move afresh against the order to be passed upon such further proceedings.
( 3 ) THE facts of the case are summarised below :-On 14th November, 1992 a truck bearing No. WBL 5972 was intercepted by the personnel of the Border
B.Bhoormal Tirupati v. The Additional Collector of Customs
Oyatape Fibres Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Collector of Customs, Calcutta
K.Narasimhiah v. H.C.Singuri Gowda
State of West Bengal v. Union of India
Kantilal Somchand Shah and Anr. v. Collector of Customs and Central Excise, West Bengal and Anr.
Alka Watches Pvt. Limited and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.