RUMA PAL, D.K.JAIN
WEBEL NICCO ELECTRONICS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ANIMA ROY – Respondent
( 1 ) -THE issue before this court is whether a Tribunal can refuse to dispose of an application for interim relief under section 15 (2) (b) of the, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereafter referred to as the Act) until the workman files the written statement.
( 2 ) BEFORE considering the issues, I must say that I am baffled by the reluctance shown in this case by the workman to file a written statement. Ordinarily the delay in disposing of an Industrial Dispute is attributed to the employer who would he interested in defeating the outcome of the dispute by exhausting the workman. In this case admittedly the workman was served with the charge sheet on 29th June, 1991. The charges are serious ones. The domestic enquiry was held between 10th July 1991 to 5th October 1993. The enquiry officer found the workman guilty. On l6th November 1993 the employee was dismissed. According to the employer this was done on a consideration of the report of the enquiry officer, records, documents and the gravity of the misconduct committed. A dispute was raised by the workman. the Government of West Bengal referred the following issue for adjudication to the Tribunal:"whether the dismi
State of Orissa v. Madan Gopal Rungta
Cotton Corporation of India Limited v. United Industrial Bank Limited
Management Hotel Imperial, New Delhi and Ors. v. Hotel Workers Union
Management of Ranipur Colliery under M/s. Equitable Co. Ltd. v. Bhuban Singh and Ors.
The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and Anr. etc. etc. v. Krishna Kant, etc.
Punjab National Bank Ltd. v. Sri Ram Kunwar, Industrial Tribunal., Delhi and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.