SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Cal) 375

S.K.SEN
VIJAY SINGH NAHATA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


S. K. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THE case of the writ petitioner is that the petitioner became an approved contractor under the Eastern Railway and was allowed Registration No. being 28356. A copy of the communication dated 24th May, 1977 whereby the petitioner was placed on the list of approved contractors initially for a period of 2 years provisionally has been annexed with the writ petition.

( 2 ) THEREAFTER, the tenure of the petitioner as registered contractor with the concerned respondents was extended from time to time by communications made to that effect. Copies of the extensions granted to the petitioner by the respondent authorities as registered contractor have been annexed with the petition marked as 'b'.

( 3 ) IN terms of the conditions laid down by the respondent for supply for electrical goods and equipments the petitioner from time to time duly supplied the said goods as required by the respondent No. 3 since 1977 which were received by them and used and/or utilised by the respondents without raising any objection with regard thereto.

( 4 ) ON or about 11th April, 1990 search and seizure was conducted under Sections 103 and 165 of the Criminal Procedure Code at the residence




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top