S.B.SINHA, S.N.BHATTACHARJEE
KHAITAN (INDIA) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 2 ) THE respondent herein had filed an application before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, Delhi, inter alia, on the ground that the appellant herein has taken recourse to unfair trade practices.
( 3 ) IN the said proceeding an application for injunction has been filed which had been granted by an order dated 8th March, 1999. Questioning the said order a writ application was filed and upon dispensing with the requirement of Rule 27 of the writ Rules framed by this court, the learned trial Judge passed interim order in favour of the writ petitioner on 11th March, 1999. The respondents having been noticed, raised preliminary questions as regards the maintainability of the writ application.
( 4 ) BOTH the aforementioned contentions as had been raised by the respondents herein, as indicated her
REFERRED TO : Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd. and Anr.
Mahindra and Mahindra Limited v. Union of India and Ors.
State Bank of Patiala and Ors. v. S.K. Sharma
Union of India and Ors. v. M/s. Oswal Woolen Mills Ltd. and Ors.
Dr. Smt. Kuntesh Gupta v. Management of Hindu Kanya Mahabidyalaya, Sitapur (U.P.) and Ors.
M/s. Baburam Prakesh Chandra Maheswari v. Antarim Zulla Parishad now Zilla Parishad, Muzaffarnagar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.