SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 212

AMITAVA LALA, S.K.MUKHERJEE
DILIP KUMAR CHATTERJEE – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL JUTE MANUFACTURES CORPORATION LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PARTHO BASU

AMITAVA LALA, J, J.

( 1 ) THE appeal arises out of the order of a single Judge sitting in Original Side Writ Jurisdiction of this Court dated 17th April, 1997 The appellant preferred this appeal on 15th May, 1997 i. e. within the prescribed period of limitation but without certified copy.

( 2 ) AS per the Rules of the High Court at Calcutta relating to applications under Article 226 of the Constitution, the matters in the Original Side, will be regulated by Original Side Rules and matters in the Appellate Side, will be regulated by Appellate Side Rules.

( 3 ) UNDER the Original Side Rules a Memorandum of Appeal has to be preferred with certified copy of the order like the Civil Appeals as prescribed by Order XLI, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Such procedure is available under Chapter XXXI, Rule 2 of the Original Side Rules. But in case of appeal arising out of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the Appellate Side of High Court, there is no necessity of filing certified copy of the order of the trial Court along with the Memorandum of Appeal at the time of preferring it, provided the appeal is filed within the prescribed period of limitation.











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top