ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY
UNION BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
VITHALBHAI PVT. LTD. – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed challenging a judgment and decree dated 12. 2. 1992 passed by the learned single Judge in Suit No. 272 of 1984. By the said judgment and decree the learned judge decreed the suit in terms of prayers (a) and (b) of the plaint. The learned Judge also gave a decree for vacant possession of the suit premises and also passed a preliminary decree appointing an Advocate for ascertaining the mesne profit on and from 25. 6. 84 untill delivery of posesion. It was also ordered that upon conclusion of the enqiry, the plaintiff-respondent will be entitled to apply for final decree for the amount found due. On this appeal being filed against such judgment and decree, the appeal Court granted stay of the exectution of the decree for ejectment but did not interfere with the direction for enquiry into mesne profits.
( 2 ) THE basic facts of the case, which are not in dispute, are stated hereunder:
( 3 ) VITHALBHAI Pvt. Ltd. , a company incorporated under the Companies Act became a lessee under a lease deed dated 25. 6. 1963 for a period of 21 years from the superior landlord, namely, M/s. Wachel Molla and Sons Pvt. Ltd. , in respect of the suit p
REFERRED TO : D.Satyanarayan v. P.Jagadish
Tej Bhan Madan v. Additional District Judge
In re: Ganesh Trading Pvt. Ltd.
Trojan and Co. v. R.N.Nagappa Chettier
Sheodhari Rai and Anr. v. Suraj Prasad Singh and Ors.
Rangayya Naidu v. Basani Simon and Ors.
Geeta Bose v. Machine Tools Ltd.
Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. v. Gustavo Ranto Da Guz Pinto
Pasupuleti Venkateswarlu v. The Motor and General Traders
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.