DIPAK KUMAR SEN, MONJULA BOSE
GENERAL BEOPAR CO. (PVT. ) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent
( 1 ) GENERAL Beopar Co. (P.) Ltd. , the assessee, is a private limited company. Some time in 1968, M/s Dabri Investment Private Ltd. , another private limited company, was amalgamated with the assessee whereupon all assets and liabilities of the latter devolved on the assessee. M/s Dabri Investment Pvt. Ltd. had prior to its amalgamation taken on lease a property which had been let out under a sublease. Subsequent to the amalgamation, the rent from the sub-lease of the said property came to be assessed in the hands of the assessee.
( 2 ) THE assessee was assessed to income-tax in the assessment year 1973-74, the accounting year ending on June 30, 1972. In the said year, the total income of the assessee was assessed at Rs. 1,84,399 of which Rs. 50,083 was found to have arisen from the business of the assessee. The rent from the sub-lease of the said property which was accruing in the hands of the assessee was calculated at Rs. 94,808 and income from dividend was calculated to be Rs. 34,508 aggregating to Rs. 1,34,316. Business losses suffered by the assessee in the earlier assessment years 1969-70 and 1970-71 were carried forward to the said assessment year fo
Referred to : CIT v. Amrital Bhogilal and Co. Ltd.
Premchand Sitanath Roy v. Addl. CIT
CIT v. Vijayalaxmi Lorry Service
V.Jaganmohan Rao v. CIT and EPT
Sun Engineering Works (P.) Ltd. v. CIT
Saran Engineering Co. Ltd. v. CIT
Singho Mica Mining Co. Ltd. v. CIT
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.