SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 9

RUMA PAL
SINGH ALLOYS AND STEEL LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SAMIR CHAKRABORTY, SUNIL CHATTERJEE

RUMA PAL, J.

( 1 ) THE point involved in this writ petition is the construction of Rule 57a of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (referred to as the Rules ). Rule 57a allows for credit of duty paid on excisable goods used as inputs on the manufactured item. The question is whether dolopatch mix, Magnesite Peas and ramming mass is an input of steel ingots.

( 2 ) THE word 'inputs' has been defined in the explanation to Rule 57a. The explanation reads as follows :-"explanation - For the purpose of this rule "inputs" includes - (a) inputs which are manufactured and used within the factory of production or in relation to the manufacture of final products; and (b) paints and packaging material, but does not include - (i) Machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances used for producing or processing of any goods or for bringing about any change in any substance in or in relation to the manufacture of the final products; (ii) packaging materials in respect of which any exemption to the extent of the duty of excise payable on the value of packaging materials is being availed of for packaging any final products; (iii) packaging materials the cost of which is not includ





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top