ARUN KUMAR MITRA
KARTICK DAS – Appellant
Versus
KAMAL GHOSH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred challenging the judgment and order dated 19. 1. 1998 passed by the learned 10th Assistant District Judge, Alipur in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 276 of 1997 affirming the order dated 27. 5. 1997 passed by the learned Munsif, 2nd Court at Alipur in Miscellaneous Case No. 50 of 1996.
( 2 ) THE background of the case may be summarised in the manner as follows: the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Sri Kamal Ghosh and Sri Amal Ghosh are the owners in respect of premises No. 208a, Rash Behari Avenue, Calcutta-29. Once Sri A. K. Dutta was the monthly tenant in respect of South Eastern Flat of the second floor of the said premises at a rental of Rs. 550. 00 payable according to English Calendar month. The rent was being paid in two shares that is Rs. 275/- each to the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (Sri Kamal Ghosh and Sri Amal Ghosh ). It appears from the records that on July 1988 the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed Title Suit No. 338/88 in the Court of learned 2nd Munsif at Alipur against one Lakshmi Rani Dutta. Originally A. K. Dutta was the tenant and Lakshmi Rani Dutta was his wife. The original tenant A. K. Dutta died and Lakshmi Rani Du
REFERRED TO : Damadilal and Ors v V Parashram and Ors
Krishna Prosad Bose v Sm Sarajibala Dasi
Bali Ram Dhote v Bhupendra Nath Banerjee and Ors
Kadiyala Venkata Subamma v Ramayya
Gian Devi Anand v Jeevan Kumar
V Dhanapal Chettiar v Yesodai Ammal
Jaspal Singh v Additional District Judge and Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.