SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 54

ARUN KUMAR MITRA
KARTICK DAS – Appellant
Versus
KAMAL GHOSH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Goutam Lahiri, JYOTIRMOY BHATTACHARYA, P.S.BASU, SUBIR RANJAN GHOSH

A. K. MITRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred challenging the judgment and order dated 19. 1. 1998 passed by the learned 10th Assistant District Judge, Alipur in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 276 of 1997 affirming the order dated 27. 5. 1997 passed by the learned Munsif, 2nd Court at Alipur in Miscellaneous Case No. 50 of 1996.

( 2 ) THE background of the case may be summarised in the manner as follows: the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Sri Kamal Ghosh and Sri Amal Ghosh are the owners in respect of premises No. 208a, Rash Behari Avenue, Calcutta-29. Once Sri A. K. Dutta was the monthly tenant in respect of South Eastern Flat of the second floor of the said premises at a rental of Rs. 550. 00 payable according to English Calendar month. The rent was being paid in two shares that is Rs. 275/- each to the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (Sri Kamal Ghosh and Sri Amal Ghosh ). It appears from the records that on July 1988 the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed Title Suit No. 338/88 in the Court of learned 2nd Munsif at Alipur against one Lakshmi Rani Dutta. Originally A. K. Dutta was the tenant and Lakshmi Rani Dutta was his wife. The original tenant A. K. Dutta died and Lakshmi Rani Du



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top