PRASENJIT MANDAL, PRATAP KUMAR RAY
Debandra Nath Mondal – Appellant
Versus
Ratan Kumar Das – Respondent
(1.) CHALLENGING the judgment and order dated 19th January, 2005 passed by the learned Trial Judge in W. P. No. 2262 (W) of 2003, this appeal has been preferred by the respondent No. 6 of the writ application against the order, quashing his appointment in the post of Peon, a Group-D post in Dantan Bhagat Charan Junior High School on the reasoning that the respondent No. 6s participation in the interview, a non-sponsored candidate, by the decision of the Managing Committed of the school was not in accordance with law, irrespective of the fact that the respondent No. 6 got an order on 19th February, 2001 in another writ application being W. P. No. 1907 (W) of 2001 whereby and whereunder managing Committee of the school was directed to consider his application seeking permanent appointment in the post in question.
(2.) THE respondent No. 6 moved the writ application being W. P. No. 1907 (W) of 2001 on the ground that as he was discharging duty of peon in the concerned school without any remuneration and voluntarily, his appointment should be made permanent following the recruitment rules in the vacant post of Peon. D. P. Kundu, J. (as His Lordship then was)disposed of the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.