SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 581

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
P.K. Samanta, J.
Bidhannagar House Owners' Association & Ors.
vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Writ Application W.P. 21533(W) of 1998 with W.P. No. 18102 (W) of 1998 with W.P. 17920 (W) of 1,998
Decided on : October 14, 1999

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
C. R. Bag, L. Kumar Chatterjee, D.K. Chatterjee, S. Bhattacharjee for the petitioners in W.P. No. 17920 (W) of 1998;
S. Pal, Dipankar Chakraborty, A. Ghosh, Tapati Dasgupta for the petitioners in W.P.No. 18102 (W) of 1998;
Fazlul Haque, Sibani Bhagat for the State in W.P. No: 18102(W) of 1998;
Balai Roy, Manick Ch. Das, Goutam Mukherjee. P.P. Chowdhury for Central Valuation Board;
Balai Roy, Manick Ch. Das, Goutam Mukherjee for the Municipality.

Headnote:

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - ARTICLE 14 - WEST BENGAL CENTRAL VALUATION BOARD (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1994 - WEST BENGAL CENTRAL VALUATION BOARD (VALUATION OF LANDS AND BUILDINGS) RULES, 1984 - ANNUAL VALUATION OF LANDS AND BUILDINGS - PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE - FAIR HEARING - REASONABLENESS - VALIDITY.

Fact of the Case:

The West Bengal Central Valuation Board (Amendment) Act, 1994, and a notification dated 30th March, 1994, amended the West Bengal Central Valuation Board Act, 1978, and the West Bengal Central Valuation Board (Valuation of Lands and Buildings) Rules, 1984, respectively. These amendments omitted the provisions relating to the publication of draft valuation lists of lands and buildings and the filing of objections against such draft valuation lists. The petitioners, owners and occupiers of lands and buildings in a Municipal Area, challenged the vires of the Amendment Act and the notification on the ground that they violated the principles of natural justice and, in the process, Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the Amendment Act and the notification were violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. It observed that the determination of annual valuation of any land or building for the purpose of imposition of municipal tax was a quasi-judicial function and that the principles of natural justice were a part of Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court further held that the procedure prescribed by the Amendment Act and the notification for the determination of annual valuation did not provide for the observance of the principles of natural justice in their fullest amplitude. It also held that the valuations determined by the Central Valuation Board were not sustainable in law as they were not supported by reasons and were not made in accordance with any standard or norm.

Issues: 1. Whether the West Bengal Central Valuation Board (Amendment) Act, 1994, and the notification dated 30th March, 1994, violated the principles of natural justice and, in the process, Article 14 of the Constitution of India? 2. Whether the procedure prescribed by the Amendment Act and the notification for the determination of annual valuation provided for the observance of the principles of natural justice in their fullest amplitude?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The principles of natural justice are a part of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and the procedure prescribed by law must be fair and reasonable. 2. The procedure prescribed by the West Bengal Central Valuation Board (Amendment) Act, 1994, and the notification dated 30th March, 1994, for the determination of annual valuation did not provide for the observance of the principles of natural justice in their fullest amplitude. 3. The valuations determined by the Central Valuation Board were not sustainable in law as they were not supported by reasons and were not made in accordance with any standard or norm.

Final Decision: The Court allowed the writ petitions and declared sections 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9(a) of the West Bengal Central Valuation Board (Amendment) Act, 1994, and the notification dated 30th March, 1994, amending the West Bengal Central Valuation Board (Valuation of Lands and Buildings) Rules, 1984, as ultra vires the Constitution of India. It also directed that the general valuation lists prepared in respect of the area of the Bidhan Nagar Municipality, as specified in the notification issued by the State Government, in compliance thereof, shall stand cancelled.

Judgment

P.K. Samanta, J.:

1.The West Bengal Central Valuation Board (Amendment) Act, 1994 (hereinafter called as Amendment Act of 1994 in short) brought about a major change in the Principal Act namely the West Bengal Central Valuation Board Act, 1978 (hereinafter called as the said Act). By Amendment Act of 1994 the provisions relating to the publication of draft valuation list of lands and buildings in a Municipality and finalisation of such valuation list upon hearing objection against such draft valuation were omitted. The West Bengal Central Valuation Board (Valuation of lands and buildings) Rules, 1984 (hereinafter called as said Rules in short) was similarly amended by a notification dated 30th March, 1994 so as to make the said Rules correspondingly compatible with the Amendment Act of 1994. By such notification the provisions made in the said Rules prescribing the mode and manner in which the objection petition against the draft annual valuation shall be filed and determined were omitted. The vires of the aforesaid Amendment Act of 1994 and the said notification has been challenged on the ground that the same violated the principles of natural justice and in the process Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

2. In these petitions the petitioners are the 0wners and/or occupiers of lands and buildings situated in a Municipal Area namely Bidhannagar Municipality. Under the relevant Municipal Laws lands and buildings are assessed for payment of Municipal Tax on the basis of annual valuation determined thereof. Lands and buildings of the petitioners within the Bidhannagar Municipal Area are governed by West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993. Annual value of a land or building which forms the basis for imposition of municipal tax is not real or market value of the property but a valuation as defined in the West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993 which is the gross annual rental at which the premises is reasonably expected to let.

3. Section 110 of the Municipal Act, 1993 provides for preparation of such annual valuation of a holding within a Municipal Area which reads as under Preparation of valuation and assessment list.- (1) The annual valuation of holdings under this Chapter shall be made, unless otherwise directed by the State Government, by the Central Valuation Board, established under the West Bengal Central Valuation Board Act, 1978 (West Bengal Act LVII of 1978) and the preparation of valuation list including determination of all objections shall abide by the provisions of that Act.

(2) When the Chairman-in-Council is directed by the State Government to under take the preparation of annual valuation, it shall determine the annual value of all holdings within a municipal area in the manner provided in this Chapter and cause publication of the assessment list in the prescribed manner.

4. Thus, annual valuation of a holding within a Municipal Area is to be determined finally by the Central Valuation Board established under the West Bengal Central• Valuation Board Act, 1978 by following the procedure prescribed therein.

5. Section 9 of the West Bengal Central Valuation Board Act, 1978 authorised the State Government to specify the area where annual general valuations of lands and buildings shall be made by the Board established under the said Act by issuing notification in this regard. Sections 10, 11 and 12 of the West Bengal Central Valuation Board Act, 1978 read as under:

Section 10. Publication of the Draft valuation list.- (1) When the valuation under section 9 of the lands and buildings in any area has been completed the Board shall cause such valuation and the amount of consolidated rate their to be entered in a list.

(2) The Board shall publish the valuation list in such manner as may be prescribed and shall specify a date within which objections to the list may be filed.

(3) After the expiry of the date specified in sub-section (2) and within such period thereafter as may be prescribed the objection shall be determined after givi














































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top