TOUFIQUE UDDIN
Jagadish Singh – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Iyer – Respondent
As the learned Advocates for both the parties submitted that the subject-matter of all the five revisions are same, so, by a common judgment, all the matters are taken up for disposal.
2. The application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was lodged by the petitioner for quashing of proceedings in connection with the complaint case No. C-26935/2011 pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 8th Court, Calcutta under Sections 418/420/406/120B IPC and the orders passed therein including the orders dated 16.1.11 and 22.1.11 respectively.
3. In brief the background of these revisions are that the petitioner is a non-executive Director of MIMEC India Ltd. situated at 5th floor, Poonam Building, 5/2, Russell Street, Calcutta-71 since 28.3.2005. Before that the petitioner was in no way connected with the said company. The petitioner came to know that on or before 14.12.11, a petition of complaint had been filed against the petitioner in complaint case No. C-26935/2011 before the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 8th Court, Calcutta. The complaint shows that the said company, being accused No. 1 alongwith accused No. 2 to 9 being Directors an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.