SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Cal) 551

JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA, ARIJIT BANERJEE
Anindya Sundar Das – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Rabi Shankar Chatterjee, Soumen Banerjee, Imtiaz Ahmed, David Francis, Sumita Sarkar, Anubhuti Ganguly, Subhasis Chakraborty, Srijib Chakraborty, Sushmita Ghosh, P. Baidya, Partha Ghosh, Sumeet Chowdhury, Saptarshi Dutta, Shreemoyee Ghosh, Saptarshi Bhattacharjee, Narendra Prasad Gutpa, Hemraj Adhikari, Subrata Mukhopadhyay, Daisy Basu, Soumen Biswas, Malabika Bhowmick, Loknath Chatterjee, Arobinda Sen, Sukanta Ghosh, Amritlal Dhar, Ashish Kr. Sanyal, Ashish Kr. Roy, Pratip Kr. Chatterjee, Chittapriya Ghosh, Uday Sankar Bhattacharyya, Anupam Kumar Bhattacharyya, Sujit Mitra, Dipanjan Bhattacharyya, Dipankar Mullick, Amarnath Agarwal, Arijit Bakshi, Kausik Samanta, Abhijit Pal, Kishore Datta, Abhrotosh Majumdar, T.M. Siddiqui, Nilotpal Chatterjee, Avra Majumdar, Debasish Ghosh, Ashoke Banerjee, Alok Ghosh, Arijit Dey, Kaushik Chanda, Debasis Basu, Ujjal Ray, Shampa Sarkar

JUDGMENT :

Arijit Banerjee, J.

1. These writ petitions have been filed as Public Interest Litigations (in short ‘PILs’). The prayers of the writ petitioners are for a direction on the respondent authorities to take appropriate measures to check the spread of Dengue in the State of West Bengal and for providing adequate medical facilities for the treatment of those afflicted with the disease. After we heard learned Counsel appearing for some of the writ petitioners, we had directed the State Government to file a report in the form of an affidavit disclosing the number of Dengue affected patients who succumbed to the disease as also the steps that were taken by the Government for combating the disease. Such a report dated 9 November 2017 was filed in this Court. Thereafter, we heard other learned Counsel appearing in support of the other writ petitions. After all the learned Counsel for the writ petitioners concluded their respective submissions, learned Adv. General appearing for the State took a preliminary point of maintainability of these writ petitions as PIL. Learned Adv. General argued at length as to why according to him, these PILs are not maintainable and should be rejected i







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top