SUBHASIS DASGUPTA
Rangalal Mavai – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Subhasis Dasgupta, J. - The impugned order dated 19th December, 2020, passed by Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Special Court, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur, in NDPS case being TR-(NDPS) 05/2020, extending the period of investigation under Section 36-A (4) proviso of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, and thereby rejecting the prayer of statutory bail for the petitioner (default bail) is the subject of challenge in this revisional application.
2. Petitioner was brought arrested on 27.06.2020 by Bhagawanpur P.S. for the alleged recovery of sixty three (63) kg. of Ganja, which was above the commercial quantity. During investigation the samples of the seized articles after necessary collection were forwarded for chemical examination. The report of the said examination could not be collected by the Investigating Officer in spite of sending reminder, even by D.O. for the purpose. The investigation of the case was almost completed, but it was due to the delay in completion of the report of expert, the charge-sheet could not be submitted against the petitioner/accused person.
3. On 17th December, 2020, the Investigating Officer of this case initiated a praye
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra
Sanjay Kumar Kedia @ Sanjay Kedia vs. Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau & Anr.
The importance of the report of the Public Prosecutor in justifying the extension of the investigation period and the refusal of default bail.
Recovery of contraband - Right of the petitioner to be released on bail on account of the default of the prosecution was rightly refused by learned court below, upon extending period of investigation....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of fulfilling specific conditions, including the report of the Public Prosecutor, progress of the investigation, and issuing a prior ....
The court emphasized the importance of the public prosecutor's independent application of mind and the need for specific and compelling reasons for seeking detention beyond the stipulated period unde....
A valid report from the public prosecutor is essential for extending the investigation period beyond 180 days under the NDPS Act, ensuring the protection of the accused's rights.
The accused's right to statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C. is violated if the extension for investigation is not properly notified, infringing upon their rights under Article 21 of the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to satisfy the essential conditions for extending the period of detention beyond 180 days under Section 36A(4) of the NDPS Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.