SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 389

AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Srikant M Abuj – Appellant
Versus
Soharab Sekh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Soumalya Ganguly, Mr. D. Ganguly, Mr. Jyoti Prakash Chatterjee, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J. - Being dissatisfied with the proceeding being CR case No. 68/2018 under section 323, 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending before the learned court of Judicial Magistrate, First Court, Kalna, Purba Burdwan, Present application under section 482 read with section 401 of the code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred. Petitioners herein contended that opposite party/complainant's father namely Rabiul Sekh is the borrower of the petitioner's bank and approached for a term loan of Rs. 8 Lakhs and additional adhoc loan of Rs. 1.50 Lakhs. After perusing and verifying all the documents, the bank had sanctioned the term loan and same was disbursed which was duly accepted by the opposite party/complainant's father, without any protest.

2. At the time of sanctioning the said term loan, the opposite party mortgaged the property, which is the property in question in the present complaint and opposite party also mortgaged deed lying in the custody of the petitioner's bank, including the form of intent to mortgage dated 10.03.2008 and the memorandum of title deeds dated 11.03.2008 duly executed by the opposite party in favour of petitioner's bank.

3. Since t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top