RAI CHATTOPADHYAY
Dipta Dutta – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
1. The Petitioner is aggrieved that the criminal proceedings initiated against him is manifestly attended with malafide, maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive of wreaking vengeance and private and personal grudge, which would be deprecatory in accordance with law. His prayer is for quashing of such a proceeding against him, which is now in motion.
2. The proceeding petitioner is mentioning about, is that in connection with Netaji Nagar Police Station Case No.19 of 2015 dated 16.01.2015 under Section 120B/448/354C/506 IPC. The corresponding pending case in the Court of Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, is ACGR No. 318 of 2015.
3. Said police case was started against the petitioner pursuant to the FIR dated 16.01.2015, filed by the present opposite party No.2.
4. Before dwelling upon the allegations made therein, one may first understand as to who the petitioner is. Record reveals that the petitioner is the employee of Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC Ltd.), working for gain in the said company, as “Assistant Manager-Recoveries”. He is duly appointed as the “authorised officers” as defined in Rule 2 (a)
Bajarang Shyamsunder Agarwal vs. Central Bank of India & Anr. reported in (2019) 9 SCC 94
Inder Mohan Goswami & Anr. Vs. State of Uttaranchal & Ors. reported in (2007) 12 SCC 1
Charanjit Singh Chanda & Ors. Vs. Sudhir Mehra reported in (2001) 7 SCC 417
Harshad Govardhan Sondagar v. International Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev v. State of Maharashtra
Standard Chartered Bank vs V. Nobel Kumar reported in (2013) 9 SCC 620
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.