IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Debangsu Basak, Bibhas Ranjan De, JJ.
Saju Sk @ Sahajur And Others - Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal - Respondent
C.R.A 123 of 2021 With DR 1 of 2021 With CRA 197 of 2021
Decided On : 25-08-2022
Death Penalty - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Section 212 IPC - [Section 302, Section 212] - The court confirmed the death sentence for the appellant Saju Sk. under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of rupees ten (10) thousand in default further rigorous imprisonment for another five (5) years. The court acquitted the appellant Alauddin Sk. of the charge under Section 212 of the IPC.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the murder of Prabir Kumar Saha by the appellant Saju Sk. at Hajarduwari Palace. The prosecution relied on the evidence of witnesses and the Post Mortem examination report to establish the guilt of the appellants. The defense argued for a reduction in the charge from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 IPC and challenged the admissibility of the Post Mortem report.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the appellant Saju Sk. guilty of murder under Section 302 IPC based on the evidence of witnesses and the Post Mortem examination report. The court also found the appellant Alauddin Sk. guilty of sheltering the offender under Section 212 IPC. The court dismissed the appeal of Saju Sk. and refused the death reference. The court acquitted Alauddin Sk. of the charge under Section 212 IPC.
Issues: The issues included the admissibility of the Post Mortem report, the sufficiency of evidence to establish guilt, and the applicability of mitigating circumstances to reduce the charge from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld the conviction of Saju Sk. under Section 302 IPC based on the corroborated evidence of witnesses and the Post Mortem examination report. The court acquitted Alauddin Sk. of the charge under Section 212 IPC due to insufficient evidence of his knowledge of the offense committed by Saju Sk.
Final Decision: The court confirmed the death sentence for Saju Sk. under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life. The court acquitted Alauddin Sk. of the charge under Section 212 IPC.
JUDGMENT
Bibhas Ranjan De, J. - Brief facts/ Background:
1. Learned Additional Sessions Judge, 4th Court, Beherumpore in the District of Murshidabad conducted Sessions Trial No. 19/08/2005 and convicted one Alauddin Sekh under Section 212 of the Indian Penal Code (for short IPC) and sentence to suffer imprisonment for five (5) years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- with default sentence to suffer imprisonment for five (5) years. Learned Judge further convicted Saju Sekh @ Sahajur and sentenced him to death for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. An order of death sentence of Saju Sekh which gave rise to death reference case no. 1 of 2021since under provision of Code of Criminal Procedure Code (for short Cr.P.C), death sentence recorded by a Judge is subject to confirmation by this Court. Saju Sekh @ Sahajur and Alauddin Sekh also preferred two separate appeal against their respective order of conviction and sentence as Criminal Appeal No. 123 of 2021 and Criminal Appeal No. 197 of 2021.
2. By this judgment we propose to dispose of the death reference as well as two criminal appeals preferred by the appellants. In the Sessions Trial No. 19/2008/2005 the law was put into motion by a written complaint lodged by one Foreman, Hari Prasad Singh, attached to Hajarduwari, Murshidabad (PW-1) complaining inter alia that on 09.07.2002 appellant Saju Sekh, one casual labour, came to their office at 08:00 a.m. to 08:30 a.m. for work. When Prabir Kumar Saha, (conservation asst., Gr. I) refused to absorb him due to official problems, in the result he became angry and threatened to kill him. Thereafter, he suddenly attacked Prabir Kumar Saha by one Iron Sickle and brutally chopped on various parts of his body. At that time one Susanta Mukherjee (Monument Attendant) (PW-5) and Sri Shyamdapada Kundu (Monument Attendant) (PW-6) were present over there and tried resist Saju Sk. but failed.
3. On receipt of the written complaint addressed to the Officer-in- Charge, Murshidabad Police Station, Lalbagh, Murshidabad Police case being no. 72/ 2002 of 09.07.2002 under Section 302 IPC was started at Murshidabad Police Station. S.I Nilanjan Roy (PW-14) attached to Murshidabad Police Station at the relevant point of time took up investigation of the case. He visited place of occurrence and prepared rough sketch map with index (exhibit-8). He prepared seizure list (exhibit -3/2) in respect of one blood stained wheel chair, two blood stained cushion, some blood stained greenish paper file, one pair of rubber sandal, blood stained coloured rubber paper and a pair of blood stained rubber shoe from the office room of Prabir Kumar Saha at Hazarduary Palace Museum, Lalbagh, in presence of witnesses. He collected dead body challans and inquest report in connection with Murshidabad P.S U.D Case No. 59/2002. He examined available witnesses and recorded their statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of two witnesses under Section 161 Cr.P.C were recorded. He arrested accused Alaudduin Sk. from Kaliganj PS Nabagram for harbouring accused Saju Sk. He made a prayer for adding Section 212 IPC against accused Alauddian Sk. He arrested accused Saju Sk. From village Elahiganj under PS Murshidabad, under custody memo (exhibit-10). On his prayer, statement of Saju Sk. under Section 164 Cr.P.C (exhibit-11) was recorded by the Learned Magistrate. On completion of investigation, Investigating Officer submitted charge sheet against appellants under Section 302/212 IPC.
4. Learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Lalbagh, by his order dated 27.08.2002 committed the case to the Learned Sessions Judge, Murshidabad, who then transferred the case to the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, 4th Court, Murshidabad, learned Judge framed charge against appellants Saju Sk. under Section 302 of the IPC and separate charge against accused Alauddin Sk. under Section 212 of the IPC.
Contents of the charge was read over and explained to the appellants/ accused who pleaded n
Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 684
Gurdial Singh and other vs. State of Punjab (2011) 2 SCC 768
The main legal point established in the judgment is the confirmation of the death sentence for murder under Section 302 IPC and the acquittal of the charge under Section 212 IPC due to insufficient e....
The court ruled that corroborative evidence is essential in murder cases, especially when convicting based on eyewitness testimony.
The court redefined the appropriateness of the death penalty in light of mitigating factors, emphasizing the need to consider a defendant's mental state and family circumstances.
The court upheld that the death penalty is an exception, emphasizing rehabilitation and reformation when sentencing for serious crimes, mandating consideration of the offender's background and potent....
The imposition of the death penalty requires the statutory provision of special reasons, and a balancing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances must be conducted.
The court upheld the conviction for double murder but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, emphasizing the need for special reasons for capital punishment and considering the possibility....
The Court determined that while the accused was guilty of murder, the imposition of death penalty was not justified under the 'rarest of rare' doctrine, leading to a sentence of life imprisonment.
Offence of Murder – Death Sentence Confirmed - Imposition of death sentence in ‘rarest of rare’ cases - Instant case falls in category of 'rarest of rare case', warranting capital punishment. Hence d....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.