SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Chh) 518

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, NARESH KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI, JJ.
State of Chhattisgarh – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Jain S/o Late Rawalmal Jain – Respondent
CRREF No. 1 of 2023, CRA Nos. 272, 507 of 2023
Decided On : 01-12-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : N.K. Shukla, Sumit Singh, M.P.S. Bhatia, Amiyakant Tiwari.
For the Respondents: Sandeep Jain, Chandresh Shrivastava.

The court upheld the conviction for double murder but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, emphasizing the need for special reasons for capital punishment and considering the possibility of reformation.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 302 - Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 27(2) - Conviction for double murder of parents resulting in death penalty - Conviction upheld but death sentence commuted to life imprisonment due to absence of direct evidence and possibility of reformation. (Paras 61, 82, 86)

(B) Circumstantial Evidence - The prosecution's case relied on circumstantial evidence, establishing a chain of events leading to the conclusion of guilt. The appellant's conduct and the absence of outside entry were significant factors. (Paras 17, 33, 46)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted of murdering his parents with a country-made pistol after a history of familial discord. The incident occurred in the family's home, with the appellant present during the crime. (Paras 1, 12, 18)

Findings of Court:
The trial court found the evidence sufficient to convict the appellant for murder, establishing the nature of death as homicidal. (Paras 60, 61)

Issues: The main issues included the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence and the appropriateness of the death penalty. (Paras 61, 62)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for special reasons to impose the death penalty and ruled that life imprisonment was adequate given the circumstances. (Paras 61, 82)

Result: Death sentence commuted to life imprisonment; conviction for murder upheld. (Paras 86)

JUDGMENT :

NARESH KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI, J.

1. Criminal appeal No. 507/2023 has been preferred by the appellant/accused Sandeep Jain against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of Sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Durg in Sessions trial No. 56/2018 dated 23-01-2023, whereby he has been convicted and sentenced as under:

Conviction

Sentence

Default stipulation

Section 302 of the IPC (Twice)

Death sentence and fine of 1,000/- (Two Rs. counts). He be hanged by the neck till he died

Additional RI for 6 months

25(1-B)(a) of the Arms Act

RI for 5 years and fine of Rs. 1,000/-

Additional RI for 6 months

27(2) of the Arms Act

RI for 10 years and fine of Rs. 1,000/-

Additional RI for 6 months

1.1 Criminal appeal No. 272/2023 has been preferred by the appellant/accused Bhagat Singh Gurudutta and Shailendra Sagar against the above judgment, whereby they have been convicted and sentenced as under:

Conviction

Sentence

Default stipulation

25(1-B)(a) of the Arms Act

RI for 5 years and fine of Rs. 1,000/-

Additional RI for 6 months

2. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Durg under the provisions of Section 366(1) of the Cr.P.C. after passing the sentence of death to Accused Sandeep Jain, submitted the proceedings to this Court for its confirmation and this is how this death reference No. 1/2023 is before us for consideration.

PROSECUTION STORY

3. The prosecution story in brief is as follows:

    3.1 Accused Sandeep Jain is the son of deceased Rawalmal Jain and Surji Bai, and other accused Bhagat Singh Gurudatta and Shailendra Sagar are associates of accused Sandeep Jain. Complaintant Saurabh Golchha on 01.01.2018 at 06:25 am, informed the police of Police Station-Durg to the effect that, he received a call from Mobile No. 94064 19291 of his maternal grandmother/Nani Surjibai in his Mobile No. 70002 91510 at 05:54 am that something has happened to his maternal grandfather/Nana, a sound has come, and she called him quickly to the house at Ganjpara, Durg then the complainant immediately went to Ganjpara, in his car. He reached his maternal grandmother’s house, where he saw that the outside and inside doors were open. When the complainant went inside the house, he saw that his maternal grand father/Nana (hereinafter referred to as ‘Nana’) was shot dead lying at corridor near bathroom and his maternal grand mother/Nani (hereinafter referred to as ‘Nani’) was lying dead on the bed, she had also been shot dead by someone. Merg No. 1/2018 regarding death of Surji Bai was recorded vide Ex.P-28 and merg No. 2/2018 regarding death of Ravalmal Jain was recorded vide Ex.P-29 at 6.15 and 6.20 am respectively. FIR No. 1/2018 was registered at 6.25 am vide Ex.P-27 for offence under Section 302 of IPC. Inquest reports of the dead body of Surji Bai and Ravalmal Jain were prepared vide Ex.P-32 and P-33 respectively. As per inquest, it was found that Surji Bai and Rawalmal Jain were killed by bullet injuries. Rawalmal Jain’s body was lying on the corridor near the bathroom and Surji Bai’s body was lying in a pool of blood on the bed in the room. Rawalmal Jain had bullet marks on his back and Surji Bai had bullet wounds on her left chest, near the elbow of her right hand and on the head. Both the dead bodies were sent to the District Hospital, Durg for post-mortem. After post-mortem, the bodies were handed over to brother of the deceased, Bhikhamchand Jain. Spot Map Ex.P-63 and site map vide Ex.P-64 have been prepared.

3.2 During the investigation, videography and photography of the residence of the deceased was done. During the inspection of the spot, empty bullet shells, cotton and blood soaked cotton found around the dead bodies of the deceased Surji Bai and Rawalmal Jain were seized in front of the witnesses. The seized material was sealed on the spot. One Blood stained bullet, two empty ca

                                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                    1
                                    2
                                    3
                                    4
                                    5
                                    6
                                    7
                                    8
                                    9
                                    10
                                    11
                                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                    supreme today icon
                                    logo-black

                                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                    Please visit our Training & Support
                                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                    qr

                                    Scan Me!

                                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                                    whatsapp-icon Back to top