SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 756

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Arijit Banerjee, Kausik Chanda, JJ.
Tara Prosad Lodha And Others - Appellant
Versus
Revenue Officer, Para And Others - Respondent
F.M.A. No. 290 of 1984, A. No. C.A.N. 3 of 2008, 5 of 2020 (Old No: C.A.N. 9798 of 2008)
Decided On : 05-05-2022

Advocates appeared:
Debayan Bera, Advocate, Chanchal Kr. Dutta, Advocate, Krishna Mullick, Advocate, Piyush Chaturbedi, Advocate, Syed Shamsher Ali, Advocate, Rajesh Upadhayay, Advocate, Lalit Mohan Mahata, Advocate, Sanjib Das, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of legal heirs to retain land as independent units under the West Bengal Estates acquisition act, 1953, based on the devolution of interest in coparcenary property under the Hindu Succession act, 1956.

Headnote:

West Bengal Estates acquisition act - Devolution of interest in coparcenary property - Hindu Succession act, 1956 - 6, 8 - The court discussed the devolution of interest in coparcenary property under the Hindu Succession act, 1956, and the entitlement of legal heirs as independent units to retain land under the West Bengal Estates acquisition act, 1953. The court found that each legal heir inherited a 1/9th undivided share in the coparcenary property, entitling them to retain land as independent units after vesting took place in 1964.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the devolution of interest in coparcenary property under the Hindu Succession act, 1956, and the entitlement of legal heirs to retain land under the West Bengal Estates acquisition act, 1953. Gajadhar Lodha, the owner of substantial lands, died in 1962, and his legal heirs sought to retain the land that vested in the State.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that each legal heir inherited a 1/9th undivided share in the coparcenary property, entitling them to retain land as independent units after vesting took place in 1964. The court also held that the legal heirs were in khas possession of the land and were entitled to file 'B' Form and statement in Form 'I' as independent units.

Issues: The issues involved the devolution of interest in coparcenary property, the entitlement of legal heirs to retain land, and the possession of the land by the legal heirs at the time of vesting.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the provisions of the Hindu Succession act, 1956, and the West Bengal Estates acquisition act, 1953, to determine the devolution of interest in coparcenary property and the entitlement of legal heirs to retain land. The court's decision was based on the legal principles of inheritance and possession.

Final Decision: The court modified the order of the learned Single Judge, allowing the legal heirs to submit return in Form 'B' and statement in Form 'I' as independent units within 4 months from the date of the order. The court also maintained status quo for a period of 4 months and directed the rehearing and disposal of the case in accordance with law.

JUDGMENT

arijit Banerjee, J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated February 18, 1982, passed in a review application being C.R. No. 7181(W) of 1980. By filing the said application, the writ petitioners had sought review of the judgment and order dated March 12, 1980, passed by the same learned Judge in Civil Rule No. 7803(W) of 1976.

2. The brief facts of the case are, one Gajadhar Lodha was the owner of substantial lands situate in the District of Purulia. Prior to becoming a part of West Bengal, the territory which is now known as Purulia was part of the State of Bihar. On February 12, 1954, the West Bengal Estates acquisition act, 1953, came into force. With effect from april 15, 1955, all estates and rights of intermediaries (defined in Section 2 (i) of the 1953 act as a proprietor, tenure-holder, under-tenure-holder or any other intermediary above a raiyat or a non-agricultural tenant and includes a service tenure-holder and, in relation to mines and minerals, includes a lessee and a sub-lessee) vested in the State (except for the District of Purulia since Purulia was then not a part of West Bengal). With effect from april 14, 1956, all estates and rights of raiyats and under-raiyats vested in the State, except for Purulia district. On June 17, 1956, the Hindu Succession act, 1956 came into force. On September 1, 1956, Bihar and West Bengal (Transfer of Territories) act, 1956, came into force. On November 1, 1956, major part of Purulia was transferred to and became a part of the State of West Bengal by virtue of Section 3 of the Bihar and West Bengal (Transfer of Territories) act, 1956. On September 24, 1958, the West Bengal Transfer of Territories (assimilation of Laws) act, 1958, came into force.

3. On april 2, 1962, Gajadhar died leaving behind as his legal heirs, his widow, two sons, two sons of two pre-deceased sons and four daughters.

4. In 1963, the West Bengal Estates acquisition (Second amendment) act, 1963, was promulgated whereby Chapter VIII, captioned 'application of the act to Transferred Territories', was incorporated in the Estates acquisitions act, 1953. Chapter VIII contains two Sections which are as follows:-

    '60. When this Chapter is to come into force.- The provisions of this Chapter shall come into force on such date and in such area of the transferred territories as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint, and for this purpose different dates may be appointed for different areas.

    Explanation.- In this Chapter 'transferred territories' means the territories transferred from the State of Bihar to the State of West Bengal by Section 3 of the Bihar and West Bengal (Transfer of Territories) act, 1956 (40 of 1956).

    61. application of the act to transferred territories. - On the issue of a notification under Section 60, in the area in respect of which such notification is issued,-

    (1) The Bihar Land Reforms act, 1950 (Bihar act 30 of 1950), shall stand repealed and the provisions of the foregoing Chapters of this act shall mutatis mutandis apply:

    Provided that any reference in the foregoing Chapters of this act to the Bengal Tenancy act, 1885 (VIII of 1885), or any provision thereof shall, as the case may be, be construed as a reference,-

    (i) in the case of application of such Chapters to the area comprised in the district of Purulia, - to the Chota Nagpur Tenancy act, 1908 (Ben. act VI of 1908), or the corresponding provision thereof, and

    (ii) In the case of application of such Chapters to any other area of the transferred territories,- to the Bihar Tenancy act, 1885 (VIII of 1885), or the corresponding provisions thereof;

    (2) estates or interests vested in the State Government under the provisions of the Bihar Land Reforms act, 1950 (Bihar act 30 of 1950), prior to the date of issue of the notification shall be deemed to have vested in the State Government under the provisions of this act:

    Provided that -

    (i) no intermediary shall be allowed to retain any lan

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top