SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 840

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
I. P. Mukerji, Aniruddha Roy, JJ.
Manav Investment And Trading Company Limited - Appellant
Versus
Dbs Bank India Limited - Respondent
APOT No. 66 of 2022, CS No. 67 of 2022, IA NO:GA/1/2022
Decided On : 11-04-2022

Advocates appeared:
Dhruvo Ghosh, Advocate, Anirban Ray, Advocate, Rajashi Dutta, Advocate, V.V. Sastry, Advocate, Debjoyti Saha, Advocate, Pankaj Agarwal, Advocate, Paramita Maity, Advocate, Jishnu Saha, Advocate, Sakabda Roy, Advocate, Trisha Mukherjee, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of sections 176 and 177 of the Indian Contract act, 1872 in the context of the sale of pledged shares and the rights of the pledgee and pledgor.

Headnote:

Pledge - Sale of Pledged Shares - The court considered whether the notices of invocation of the pledge dated 23rd February, 2022 can be construed as reasonable notice to sell the pledged goods as provided in section 176 of the Indian Contract act, 1872.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, pledgor of shares of Birla Tyres Ltd. [BTL], was given notices to pay outstanding amounts failing which the pledged shares would be sold. The appellant contested the reasonableness of the notice and the length of the notice.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the notices issued by the pledgee were exercise of the first right to sell the pledged shares upon reasonable notice and an opportunity given to the pledgor to redeem the shares before the sale. The court directed that the pledgee refrain from selling the shares till a specified date to give an opportunity to the appellant to redeem the shares.

Issues: The main issue was whether the notices of invocation of the pledge can be construed as reasonable notice to sell the pledged goods as provided in section 176 of the Indian Contract act, 1872.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted sections 176 and 177 of the Indian Contract act, 1872 and held that the notices issued by the pledgee were in line with the rights recognized in the act. The court also provided specific directions regarding the sale of the pledged shares and the encashment of the bank guarantee.

Final Decision: The impugned judgment and order was substantially affirmed and modified by the court's order. The appeal and the stay application were disposed of accordingly.

JUDGMENT

We do not want to keep this appeal pending. We have heard it out, dispensing with all formalities.

The appellant is the pledgor of shares of Birla Tyres Ltd. [BTL] today, worth about Rs.14 crores. These shares were pledged with the respondent bank to secure their loan from the bank.

By a notice dated 23rd February, 2022 the appellant was given time to pay Rs.15,87,50,000/- by noon of 16th March, 2022. In default, the respondent would proceed to sell the shares. By another notice of the same date the appellant was called upon to pay the entire outstanding amount of Rs.70,17,15,582.20 by noon of 16th March, 2022, failing which the remaining pledged shares would be sold.

The very short question which arises in this appeal is whether the notices of invocation of the pledge dated 23rd February, 2022 can be construed as reasonable notice to sell the pledged goods as provided in section 176 of the Indian Contract act, 1872 ?

Sections 176 and 177 of the said act enact as follows :

'176. Pawnee's right where pawnor makes default.-If the pawnor makes default in payment of the debt, or performance; at the stipulated time or the promise, in respect of which the goods were pledged, the pawnee may bring a suit against the pawnor upon the debt or promise, and retain the goods pledged as a collateral security; or he may sell the thing pledged, on giving the pawnor reasonable notice of the sale.

If the proceeds of such sale are less than the amount due in respect of the debt or promise, the pawnor is still liable to pay the balance. If the proceeds of the sale are greater than the amount so due, the pawnee shall pay over the surplus to the pawnor.

177. Defaulting pawnor's right to redeem.-If a time is stipulated for the payment of the debt, or performance of the promise, for which the pledge is made, and the pawnor makes default in payment of the debt or performance of the promise at the stipulated time, he may redeem the goods pledged at any subsequent time before the actual sale of them, but he must, in that case, pay, in addition, any expenses which have arisen from his default.'

Mr. Ghosh, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that by the aforesaid notices time was extended by the bank to make the aforesaid payment by noon of 16th March, 2022. If payment was made by his client by that time, it would be taken that the right to redeem had been exercised. If there was failure reasonable time ought to have been given to the appellant from 16th March, 2022 to make the payment. By the above notices the respondent sought to exercise their right of sale immediately upon the default of the appellant at noon of 16th March, 2022.

Sections 176 and 177 of the said act recognizes two rights. The first is the right of the pledgee to sell the article pledged upon reasonable notice to the pledgor. This is independent of the right of the pledgor to redeem the goods pledged at any point of time before sale is effected by the pledgee. In our view, the said two notices issued by the pledgee/respondent are exercise of the first right and at the same time an opportunity given by them to the pledgor to exercise the second right. In other words, the notice is that the sale would be effected at any point of time after noon of 16th March, 2022 and that the pledgor would have the option to redeem the shares before that time. We find nothing wrong or irregular in the said notices.

However, for whatever reasons the shares of the appellant are with the respondent for some period of time. Since the complaint of the appellant/pledgor is only with regard to the reasonableness of the notice and to be more specific the length of the notice, we direct that provided the price of shares which is prevailing today at this point of time [Rs.23.95] does not fall, the pledgee shall refrain from selling the shares till 21st april, 2022 to give an opportunity to the appellant for the last time to redeem the pledged shares. If there is fall in the share price to Rs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top