SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 203

PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ
Anupam Bera – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:Susmita Saha Dutta, Asit Kumar Manna, Niladri Saha, Madhurima Basu, Sauvik Nandy, Avijit Chakraborty, Advocates.
For the Respondents:S.N. Mookherjee, AG., Md. Ghalib, Tarunjyoti Tewari, Abhrotosh Majumder, Joydip Kar, Sr. Advocate, Nilotpal Chatterjee, N.C. Bihani, Soumya Mazumder, Suranjan Dasgupta, Uttam Mandal, Soumya Mazumder, A. Ray, P. Ghosh, Riaz Abedin, Asif Dewan, Amitava Chaudhuri, N. Roy, Anil Kumar Gupta, Subhrangshu Panda, Debjani Sengupta, Shahina Haque, Koyel Bag, Raghunath Chakraborty, Amrita De, Arunangshu Chakraborty, Aswini Bera, Geneya Mukherjee, Soumya Majumder, Sanjukta Dutta, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Prakash Shrivastava, C.J.

1. The petitioner being General Secretary of one Jatiyatabadi Adhyapak O Gabeshak Sangha, a registered society and organization of educationist, has filed the present public interest petition challenging the validity of West Bengal University Laws (Amendment) Act, 2012 and West Bengal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2014 and has prayed for writ of quo warranto questioning the appointments of respondent nos. 5 to 35 as Vice-Chancellors of different Universities within the State of West Bengal.

2. The plea of the petitioner is that the provisions of the West Bengal University Laws (Amendment) Act, 2012 (for short, ‘Act of 2012’) and West Bengal University Laws (Amendment) Act, 2014 (for short, ‘Act of 2014’) are ultra vires of the provisions of the Constitution of India, University Grants Commission Act and the UGC Regulations of 2010 and 2018. Further plea of the petitioner is that the respondent Vice-Chancellors have been appointed either by a Search Committee which was not properly constituted or without constituting any such Committee. Some of the appointments are also being challenged on the ground that they do not fulfill the minimum eligibility criteria o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top