SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Subir Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
Sk. Anisur Rahaman – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.) :
1. The present revision has been preferred praying for quashing of the proceeding in C.R. Case No. 990 of 2018 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, 4th Court, Purba Bardhaman.
2. The petitioner's case is that the opposite party herein lodged a written complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Burdwan alleging, inter alia, the following facts :
ii) That the accused person is a LIC Agent and few years ago, he came to the house of the complainant for making a LIC policy and the complainant deposited the money with LIC.
iii) The accused person wanted to take a personal loan in the year 2018 for his business.
iv) The complainant gave Rs.27 lakhs in cash to the complainant.
v) In order to repay the said amount the accused issued one cheque bearing No. 847014 dated 10.10.2018, for Rs.27,00,000/-(Rupees twenty seven lakhs) drawn on South Indian Bank, Burdwan Branch, and the complainant deposited th
M.M.T.C. Ltd. and Anr. v. Medchl Chemicals and Pharma (P) Ltd. and Anr. (2002) 1 SCC 234
Goaplast (P) Ltd. v. Chico Ursula D’souza and Anr. (2003) 3 SCC 232
Rangappa v. Sri Mohan (2010) 11 SCC 441
Vinod Tanna and Another vs. Zaher Siddiqui and others
M/s Laxmi Dyechem vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.
NEPC Micon Ltd. Vs. Magma Leasing Ltd. (1999) 4 SCC 253
Kanwar Singh v. Delhi Administration (AIR 1965 SC 871)
Swantraj v. State of Maharashtra (1975) 3 SCC 322
State of Tamil Nadu v. M.K. Kandaswami (1975) 4 SCC 745
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.