Back
DEEPAK GUPTA
Harpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. investments were made based on cheques handed over for liability. (Para 4 , 10) |
| 2. arguments raised on account control and previous liabilities are contested. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 3. cheques returned due to closed accounts still presume liability under the ni act. (Para 18 , 27 , 30) |
| 4. court concludes no merit in overturning initial judgments; revisions dismissed. (Para 19 , 38 , 51) |
JUDGMENT
Deepak Gupta, J. - This order shall disposed of 12 revisions i.e. CRR Nos.3456, 3515, 3520, 3481, 3474, 3476, 3471, 3484 & 3479 of 2019 and CRR Nos.1421 and 1986 of 2022, arising out of 12 separate judgments of conviction and orders of sentence, whereby complaints filed by Dharam Singh (respondent herein) or his son Ashok Kumar, for dishonour of different cheques issued by same accused Harpal Singh (petitioner herein) as director of M/s Pal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., were decided by ld. Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gurgaon, convicting accused Harpal Singh under Section 138 of the NI Act and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment in each case for varying period and also to pay c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
