C. R. DASH, PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Indian Oil Corporation Limited – Appellant
Versus
Madhududan Majilya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.
1. In these two intra Court appeals the order dated 10.04.2017 as passed in WP 23810(W) of 2007 by the Hon’ble Single Bench has been assailed. Since both the appeals have been preferred against a common judgement and since the facts and laws involved in these two appeals are identical, we propose to dispose of these two appeals by a common judgement.
2. Before the Hon’ble Single Bench the aforementioned writ petition was filed challenging the notice of termination dated 25.08.2006 as issued by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.(hereinafter referred to as the ‘Oil Company’, in short) in favour of Madhusudan Majilya being the proprietor of M/S Tarkeswar Gas Service (the respondent in FMA 1108/2008 and the appellant in MAT 1372/2017)(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Distributor’) whereby and whereunder the said Oil Company terminated the distributorship agreement dated 14.03.1989 as entered by and between them and at the same time also terminated the appointment of the said distributor with immediate effect.
3. The Hon’ble Single Bench while disposing the writ petition by the impugned order expressed the view that the Oil Company had waived their right of ter
Associated Hotels of India Ltd. vs. S.B Sardar Ranjit Singh (AIR 1968 SC 933);
Union of India and Others vs. N.Murugesan and Others [(2022) 2 SCC 25)];
Kastha Niwarak Grahnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Indore vs. President
Moumita Poddar vs. IOC reported in (2010) 9 SCC 291
Sneh Prabha and Ors. Vs. State of U.P and Ors. [(1996) 7 SCC 426];
Kerala State Electricity Board vs. Saratchandran P. and Ors. [(2008) 9 SCC 396].
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.