SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Prithvish Roy – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.:
1. The present revision has been preferred praying for quashing of the proceeding being Complaint Case No. 41 of 2018 under Sections 323/498A/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending before the Court of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class Court at Barrackpore.
2. The Petitioner’s case is that the Petitioner is the Husband of the opposite party no. 2. On February 6, 2018, the opposite party no. 2 herein filed a complaint application against the petitioner (husband) and his other family members under Section 200 of CRPC before the Court of the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Barrackpore [in short the Learned ACJM] therein alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 323/498A/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Vide order dated February 6, 2018 the Learned ACJM was pleased to take cognizance and transferred the case to the Learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, First Court at Barrackpore [in short the Learned Trial Magistrate] for disposal and the Learned Trial Magistrate was pleased to issue process.
4. It is the case of the petitioner that, on June 30, 2013, the opposite party no. 2 got married to the Peti
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and Anr; (2014) 8 SCC 273
Geeta Mehrotra & Anr. Vs. State of UP & Anr; (2012) 10 SCC 741
G.V. Rao vs. L.H.V. Prasad & Ors. reported in (2000) 3 SCC 693
K. Subba Rao v. The State of Telangana
Rajesh Sharma and Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr; (2018) 10 SCC 472
Preeti Gupta & Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr; (2010) 7 SCC 667
The judgment established the importance of specific evidence and cautioned against general omnibus allegations in matrimonial disputes, emphasizing the potential misuse of Section 498A IPC and the ne....
The court established that specific allegations are necessary to sustain a charge under Section 498A IPC, preventing misuse of the provision in matrimonial disputes.
The court held that the ingredients required to constitute the offences under Sections 498A/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code are clearly absent in the present case and the allegations are general and....
In the absence of any specific role attributed to the accused appellants, it would be unjust if the Appellants are forced to go through the tribulations of a trial, i.e., general and omnibus allegati....
The judgment established the importance of specific allegations and cautioned against implicating relatives of the husband without prima facie evidence in cases under Section 498A of the Indian Penal....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.