SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 1194

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.

Dr. Ajay Kumar Arya – Petitioner
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Opp. Parties
CRR 1113 of 2019
Decided On : 01-05-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Minal Palana.
For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Ms. Rita Dutta, Mr. Baidurya Ghosal, Mr. Saikat Mukherjee.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that specific allegations are necessary to sustain a charge under Section 498A IPC, preventing misuse of the provision in matrimonial disputes.

Headnote:

Quashing - 498A IPC - 498A IPC - The court discussed the provisions of Section 498A IPC, emphasizing the need for specific allegations against the accused to avoid misuse of the law. It highlighted the importance of careful scrutiny in matrimonial disputes to prevent unjust trials based on general allegations.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a husband, sought to quash proceedings under Section 498A IPC initiated by his wife, alleging mental torture and threats. The couple had been living separately for years, and the petitioner claimed to have supported his children financially.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the allegations against the petitioner were general and did not establish a prima facie case under Section 498A IPC. It emphasized the need for specific allegations to avoid misuse of the law.

Issues: Whether the allegations made against the petitioner under Section 498A IPC were specific enough to warrant a trial.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that general and omnibus allegations do not suffice to proceed with a trial under Section 498A IPC, as they can lead to misuse of the legal process.

Result: The proceedings against the petitioner under Section 498A IPC were quashed.

JUDGMENT :

(Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.) :

1. The present revision has been preferred by the husband/petitioner praying for quashing of proceedings in connection with GR No. 2992 of 2016 arising out of Baguiati Police Station Case no. 712 of 2016 dated 14.07.2016 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 presently pending before the Court of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barasat Court, Barasat, North 24 Parganas including the Charge Sheet being No. 1365/16 dated 30.11.2016 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 filed against the Petitioner herein and Order dated 04.07.2018 whereby the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate was pleased to take cognizance upon Charge Sheet No. 1365/16 dated 30.11.2016 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the Petitioner herein.

2. The petitioner is a doctor by profession and his wife/opposite party no.2 has filed the complaint in the proceeding in this case.

3. The Petitioner states that the allegations as leveled against the Petitioner herein are to the effect that:-

    The Petitioner had been creating disturbance into the peaceful possession of a flat wherein the Opposite Party No.2 has been residing along with the children, thereby inflicting mental torture upon the Opposite Party No.2. The Opposite Party No.2 has further alleged that the Petitioner has threatened the Opposite Party No.2 in her own home to remove her from the said flat and has been boastful about the power he holds in the society and that the same can be used to harass the Opposite Party No. 2.

It has been further stated the Petitioner herein did not look after his children and did not bear any expenses of his children’s education and other things and that the Petitioner visited the Opposite Party No.2’s flat several times and quarreled with her and threatened her. It has also been stated in the Charge Sheet that when the accused person herein went to meet his children at another flat where the Opposite Party no. 2 is residing with the children, the Opposite Party no. 2 had driven him out of the flat.

4. The marriage between the parties in this case was solemnized on 02.06.1990. From the said Wedlock, two daughters and a son were born to the parties, namely Annie Arya, now aged about 24 years and working for gain at Mumbai after completing her L.L.B. from Bhubaneswar, Orissa. The younger daughter namely Jasmine Arya, now aged about 20 years is studying in Mumbai and Tejas Arya, now aged about 17 years is old studying in Kolkata.

5. The Petitioner went to England with his wife and elder daughter in the year 1994 for further higher doctors’ degree and came back in 2001.

6. The constant bickering of the Opposite Party No.2 for money compelled the Petitioner to leave his own house and since then i.e. since 7 years, the Petitioner has been living in a different apartment at Club Town Enclave, South Block, Flat 6/2F, Chinar Park, Ataghara, Kolkata – 700157 with his mother.

7. That all the expenses for the education and maintenance of the children have been borne by the Petitioner. The petitioner has been paying maintenance to the Opposite Party No. 2 as well as the household expenses.

8. Application for judicial separation and custody of the children has been filed by the petitioner.

9. Application for maintenance has been filed by the Opposite Party No. 2.

10. The daughter of the parties namely Annie Arya in her application for relinquishment of her claim of maintenance has stated as follows in petition:-

    i) The Petitioner No.2/Annie Arya states that there is a long standing matrimonial dispute by and between her mother Smt. Neelam Arya and her father Dr. Ajay Kumar Arya.

ii) The Petitioner No.2/Annie Arya further states that though there are some differences in disputes by and between the parent of the present Petitioner No.2 /Annie Arya, the father of the Petitioner No.2/Annie Arya namely Dr. Ajay Kumar Arya never forgets his emotional and financial responsibilities towards his daughter who is

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top