IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
Subhash Karmakar – Petitioner
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Opposite Parties
CRR 800 of 2019
Decided On : 23-08-2023
CRIMINAL LAW - SECTION 498A IPC - HUSBAND AND WIFE - CRUELTY - INGREDIENTS - QUASHING OF CHARGE SHEET - COURT HELD THAT THE CHARGE SHEET WAS LACKING THE ALLEGATIONS IN ABSENCE OF THE SPECIFIC AVERMENT OF INGREDIENTS UNDER SECTION 498A OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE AND AS SUCH, THE ALLEGATION UNDER SECTION 498A OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE HAS NO MANNER OF APPLICATION WITH THE PRESENT IMPUGNED PROCEEDING AND AS SUCH, THE IMPUGNED CRIMINAL PROCEEDING SHOULD BE QUASHED. THE COURT FURTHER HELD THAT THE CONTINUATION OF THIS IMPUGNED CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IS OTHERWISE BAD IN LAW AND ABUSE OF PROCESS OF LAW.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the charge sheet filed against him under Sections 498A/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that the ingredients of Section 498A were not made out and the allegations were general and omnibus in nature.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the charge sheet was lacking the allegations in absence of the specific averment of ingredients under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and as such, the allegation under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code has no manner of application with the present impugned proceeding and as such, the impugned criminal proceeding should be quashed.
Issues: Whether the charge sheet filed against the petitioner under Sections 498A/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code was valid?
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Supreme Court judgments in Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors., M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Ramveer Upadhyay & Anr. Vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., and Umesh Kumar Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Anr. to hold that the ingredients required to constitute the said offences are clearly absent in the present case.
Final Decision: The court allowed the revisional application and quashed the proceeding being Chakdaha Police Station Case No. 156 of 2018 dated 21.05.2018 under Section 498A/406/506 of IPC including the charge sheet, now pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalyani.
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
1. The present revision has been preferred praying for quashing of the charge sheet being no. 270 of 2018 dated 22.06.2018 under Sections 498A/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 arising out of G.R. No. 358 of 2018 corresponding to Chakdaha Police Station Case No. 156 of 2018 dated 21.05.2018 under Sections 498A/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, now pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalyani, alternatively, for passing appropriate order by directing the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalyani to dispose of the impugned criminal proceeding being G.R. No. 358 of 2018 arising out of Kalyani Police Station Case No. 156 of 2018 dated 21.05.2018 under Sections 498A/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioner’s case is that the present prosecution case arose out of a written complaint dated 06.03.2018, lodged by the victim Smt. Indranee Roy Karmakar addressed to the Officer-in-Charge, Barrackpore Police Station, alleging inter alia that her negotiated marriage through ‘Bharat Matrimonial’ was held with the petitioner on 01.08.2017. It is alleged that her uncle in law Animesh Bhattacharjee made her life miserable by committing mental torture upon her. Her mother in law took possession of her gold ornaments. Thus, she left her matrimonial home sometime in the beginning of December, 2017 due to such reasons. She further alleged that she left all her belongings which is required to be recovered. Hence, she prayed for punishment of the accused persons.
3. Initially Noapara Police Station Case No. 56 of 2018 dated 06.03.2018 under Sections 498A/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code was started and then the case was transferred by the Ld. A.C.J.M., Barrackpore to the Court of Ld. A.C.J.M., Kalyani on 23.03.2018 for want of jurisdiction. The case was then registered as Chakdaha P.S. Case 156/18 dated 21.05.2018.
4. On 11.06.2018, the complainant prayed for return of the seized stridhan. The investigating officer produced the seizure list of the stridhan. On 25.06.2018, the complainant prayed for return of the seized articles from the police custody and the learned Magistrate directed the police to return the seized stridhan articles upon getting her ‘zimmanama’ bond. The said bond was executed on the same day and the same was accepted.
5. Charge Sheet being No. 270 of 2018 dated 22.06.2018 under Sections 498A/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code against the husband i.e. the present petitioner, father-in-law and mother-in-law was submitted and cognizance was taken.
6. Mr. Soumya Banerjee, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the charge sheet has been lacking the allegations in absence of the specific averment of ingredients under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and as such, the allegation under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code has no manner of application with the present impugned proceeding and as such, the impugned criminal proceeding should be quashed.
7. The continuation of this impugned criminal proceeding is otherwise bad in law and abuse of process of law.
8. Mr. Manoranjan Mahata, learned counsel for the State has placed the case diary.
9. In spite of due service there is no representation on behalf of the opposite party no. 2.
10. From the materials on record and the case diary, it appears that the opposite party no. 2 in her written complaint has stated that she was mentally tortured by the petitioner and his relatives since her marriage on 01.08.2017. Her mother-in-law took all her gold ornaments. She left her matrimonial home in December, 2017 leaving all her belongings.
11. Thus, it is evident that the marriage lasted for about two months. The allegations in the written complaint are short and general in nature. The complainant has received all her articles through Court.
12. Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, lays down:-
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and Anr
Ashok Chaturvedi v. Shitul H. Chanchani
G. Sagar Suri v. State of U.P.
G.V. Rao vs. L.H.V. Prasad & Ors. reported in (2000) 3 SCC 693
Geeta Mehrotra & Anr. Vs. State of UP & Anr; (2012) 10 SCC 741
K. Karunakaran v. State of Kerala
K. Subba Rao v. The State of Telangana
Padal Venkata Rama Reddy v. Kovvuri Satyanarayana Reddy
Parkash Singh Badal v. State of Punjab
Preeti Gupta & Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr; (2010) 7 SCC 667
Rajesh Sharma and Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr; (2018) 10 SCC 472
Rajiv Thapar v. Madan Lal Kapoor
Sheonandan Paswan v. State of Bihar
The court held that the ingredients required to constitute the offences under Sections 498A/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code are clearly absent in the present case and the allegations are general and....
In cases where the materials in the case diary and the charge sheet do not prima facie make out a case of cognizable offence against the accused, the proceedings should be quashed.
General and omnibus allegations of cruelty and harassment under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prevention Act cannot be the basis for initiating criminal proceedin....
The court's inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash proceedings where the allegations are frivolous or do not disclose any offense, or where the proceedings are an abuse of p....
The power to quash proceedings should be exercised sparingly and with circumspection, and that criminal proceedings ought not to be scuttled at the initial stage. In the present case, the allegations....
In the absence of any specific role attributed to the accused appellants, it would be unjust if the Appellants are forced to go through the tribulations of a trial, i.e., general and omnibus allegati....
The court emphasized the necessity of specific allegations in Section 498A IPC cases to prevent misuse and quashed proceedings lacking prima facie evidence.
General and omnibus allegations, without any specific act of cruelty attributed, do not constitute a cognizable offense under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, and proceedings based on such alle....
The inherent power of the court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure can be exercised to quash proceedings in a case where there is no substance in the allegations and no material exis....
The judgment established the importance of specific allegations and cautioned against implicating relatives of the husband without prima facie evidence in cases under Section 498A of the Indian Penal....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.