SOUMEN SEN, SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA
Jute Corporation of India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
ABL International Ltd. (Now Sudera Realty Pvt. Ltd. ) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SOUMEN SEN, J.
1. These present appeals and cross-appeals are arising out of a common judgment and order dated April 23, 2018 passed by a learned Single Judge in connection with four applications for setting aside of two arbitral awards both dated December 20, 2013 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter ‘the 1996 Act’).
I. Summary of Facts
2. The facts relevant for the purpose of deciding these appeals, are summarised below:
Abhey Realtors Pvt. Ltd. vs. SSIPL Retail
Associated Engineering Builders vs. Delhi Development Authority
Delhi Development Authority vs. R.S. Sharma
Food Corporation of India vs. Babulal Agarwal
Kailash Nath Associates vs. D.D.A. and Another
Kusheshwar Prosad Singh vs. State of Bihar and Others
K.B. Saha and Sons Private Ltd. vs. Development Consultant Ltd. 2008 (8) SCC 564
Murlidhar Chiranjilal vs. Marishchandra Dwarkadas and Others
Muddasani Venkata Narsaiah vs. Muddasani Sarojana
Mc Dermott International vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. 2006 (11) SCC 181
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003) 5 SCC 705
Park Street Properties Private Limited vs. Dipak Kumar Singh and Another
Patel Engineering Limited vs. North Eastern Electric Power Corporation
Pannalal Jugatmal vs. State of M.P. AIR 1963 M.P. 242
P.R. Shah Shares and Stock Brothers vs. M/s. B.H.H. Securities (P) Ltd. 2012 (1) SCC 594
Ravindra Kumar Gupta and Co. vs. Union of India
Samir Narayan Bhojwani vs. Aurora Properties and Investment and Another
Sangyong Engineering and Construction Company Ltd. vs. National Highway Authority of India
State of U.P. and Others vs. Lalji Tandon (Dead) through L.Rs. 2004 (1) SCC 1
State of Gujarat and Others vs. Nirmalaben S. Mehta and Another
SMS Tea Estates Pvt. Ltd. vs. Chandmari Tea Company Pvt. Ltd. 2011 (14) SCC 66
Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P) Ltd. vs. Hede and Company
State of Rajasthan and Others vs. Ferro Concrete Construction Pvt. Ltd. 2009 (12) SCC 1
V.L. Sreedhar and Others vs. K.M. Munireddy (Dead) and Others
The court upheld the Arbitral Award, emphasizing limited grounds for interference and confirming the validity of the Sole Arbitrator's findings regarding the Lease Deed.
The court upheld the Arbitral Award, affirming that the Sole Arbitrator's findings were plausible and did not warrant judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
The arbitrator must address allegations of fraud and collusion affecting the enforceability of a contract; failure to do so results in an award being set aside for patent illegality.
(1) Payment of rent – Rights and liabilities of parties arise from date of execution of lease and not from any anterior date.(2) Arbitral award – Grounds for setting aside an award are very limited.
The court affirmed that an arbitral award can only be set aside for patent illegality, emphasizing that lessor maintained obligations under the lease despite lessee's claims. Termination due to non-p....
Limited interference with arbitral awards under S.34/37 of A&C Act; partial set-aside for patent illegality in severable claims.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.