SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 1321

RABINDRANATH SAMANTA
Sangita Chakladar – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Company Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Amit Ranjan Roy.
For the Respondent: Sucharita Pal.

JUDGMENT :

RABINDRANATH SAMANTA, J.

1. Assailing the compensation awarded by the learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (in short tribunal), 3rd Court, Krishnagar, Nadia in MACC No. 2013 of 2021 as inadequate compensation, the claimants - Sangita Chakladar, Rita Chakladar (Biswas) and Khantabala Chakladar - have preferred the instant appeal. By the impugned award dated March 4, 2021 the learned tribunal directed the United India Insurance Company to pay an amount of Rs. 46,33,168/- as compensation to the claimants.

2. It may be noted herein that during pendency of the appeal, the third appellant - Khantabala Chakladar, the mother of the deceased - expired and on her demise the claimant no. 1, Sangita Chakladar, has been treated as her legal heir.

3. The background facts which led the filing of the claim application under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which are necessary for adjudication may be summarized as follows.

4. On June 14, 2016 at about 7.30 a.m. Santi Ranjan Chakladar of Jagadanandapur, Bethuadahari, P.S. Nakashipara, district Nadia along with his nephe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top