Sayantani Ghosh vs Sukesh Ranjan Koley

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Cal) 903

KRISHNA RAO
Sayantani Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Sukesh Ranjan Koley – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajdeep Bhattacharya.
For the Respondent: Ms. Kabita Mukherjee, Mr. Manas Dasgupta, Mr. Meghajit Mukherjee.

JUDGMENT :

Krishna Rao, J.

1. The petitioner has filed the present application for review of the order passed by this Court dated 29th May, 2023 in CO No. 1716 of 2023.

2. The petitioner has filed the Civil Revisional Application being C.O. No. 1716 of 2023 challenging the order passed by the Learned District Judge in Matrimonial Suit No. 56 of 2017 dated 8th May, 2023 wherein the Learned District Judge has dismissed the application of the petitioner for enhancement of maintenance pendent lite.

3. By an order dated 29th May, 2023, this Court had dismissed the revisional application on the ground that this Court did not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order.

4. Mr. Rajdeep Bhattacharya, Learned Advocate representing the petitioner submits that this Court while dismissing the civil revisional application has not considered the affidavit of assets filed by both the parties before the Learned Court of District Judge along with the application filed for enhancement of the alimony pendente lite.

5. Mr. Bhattacharya submitted that in the affidavit of assets, the respondent has declared his monthly income as Rs.3,74,950/-per month which this Court has not considered while dismissi