SHAMPA DUTT PAUL
Kapil Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.
1. The present revision has been preferred praying for quashing of the proceeding being Complaint Case No. 0088326/2016 under Sections 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code now pending before the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 8th Court, Calcutta.
2. The petitioners’ case is that the opposite party no. 2 in the complaint dated 25.05.2016 has stated as follows:
(ii) That the complainant company on several occasions requested the petitioners to pay the money back but a total sum of Rs.4,52,61,889/- is still lying outstanding to be payable by the petitioners herein and that the complainant being the opposite party no. 2 is entitled to get an interest on the sum outstanding at the rate of 18% per annum and also to have a sum of Rs.68,460/- as compensation for blocking the godown of the com
Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Duncans Agro Industries Ltd. 1996 (5) SCC 591
Chelloor Mankkal Narayan Ittiravi Nambudiri vs. State of Travancore
G. Sagar Suri vs. State of U.P. 2000 (2) SCC 636
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma vs. State of Bihar
Jaswantrai Manilal Akhaney vs. State of Bombay
Medchl Chemicals and Pharma (P) Ltd. vs. Biological E. Ltd. 2000 (3) SCC 269
Madhavrao Jiwaji Rao Scindia vs. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre
Nageshwar Prasad Singh alias Sinha vs. Narayan Singh and Another
Prem Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan and Another
Rupan Deol Bajaj vs. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill
Rajesh Bajaj vs. State NCT of Delhi
State of Bihar vs. Rajendra Agrawalla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.