JUDGMENT :

ANIRUDDHA ROY, J.

1. This contempt proceeding arose from an order dated November 27, 2013 passed by a Coordinate Bench in a Writ Petition being W.P. No. 33136 (W) of 2013. Rule was issued by the coordinate bench on June 14, 2016. The contempt proceeding had been taken up for final disposal.

Facts:

2. The facts relevant to adjudicate upon this proceeding were not much.

3. The order dated November 27, 2013 Annexure P-1 at page 21 to the writ petition was passed by a coordinate bench disposing of the writ petition with the following observation and direction:

“It appears that the case of the writ petitioner should be considered and decided by the concerned D.I taking note of the fact that the writ petitioner has been working in the said school since 2001. Accordingly the concerned D.I. is directed to decide the case of the petitioner upon giving an opportunity of hearing to the writ petitioner and/or his authorized representative and allowing him to produce relevant circular, documents, judgment in support of his case, within six weeks from date of communication of this order and pass a reasoned order and the same be communicated within two weeks from date of passing such order.