Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
NEERAJ TIWARI
Harsh Vardhan – Appellant
Versus
Rahul Pandey, The District Magistrate – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of contempt application. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties' arguments regarding contempt. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on interim orders. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. nature of the inquiry vs. disciplinary action. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. interpretation of wilful disobedience in contempt. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. consequences of vacating interim orders. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. conclusion on merits of the contempt application. (Para 24 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
1. Heard Ms. Shreya Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel/Additional Advocate General along with Sri Brijesh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party.
2. Present contempt application has been filed to punish the opposite party for violation of order of Writ Court dated 12.05.2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6389 of 2024.
3. Brief facts of the case are that against the applicant, opposite party- District Magistrate, Hathras vide order dated 9.4.2025 has attached the applicant with District Head Quarter/ Collectorate, Hathras. The said order was challenged before this Court and Court has stayed the order dated
The Court held that mere non-compliance with interim orders does not constitute contempt unless it is demonstrated that such disobedience was wilful and deliberate.
Contempt - Appellant can be exonerated for contempt of court giving benefit of doubt as he tendered unconditional apologies sincerely for the delay in implementation of the order of the court with al....
Wilful disobedience, as an essential element of civil contempt, requires a high standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt and involves a mental element of intentional, conscious, and calculated condu....
The court must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the contemnor has willfully, deliberately and intentionally violated the court's order. If the disobedience is the result of some compelling c....
Contempt proceedings necessitate clear evidence of willful disobedience of court orders; mere allegations are insufficient.
Contempt of court requires willful disobedience of a court order; mere delay, especially under extenuating circumstances, does not constitute contempt.
An appeal against a contempt order is maintainable only if it involves punishment for contempt; the court found justifiable reasons for the delay in compliance with the order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
