SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Namarta Vashisht – Appellant
Versus
Transmission Line Products – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
1. The present revision has been preferred praying for quashing of the complaint under Section 138/141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (as amended up to date) registered as Case No. C.S No. 93322 of 2018 pending before the court of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Calcutta.
2. The petitioner's case is that the petitioner is neither the Director nor the signatory of the accused company and it is well settled law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that complaint under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act can only be initiated against the Director of the Company and as such, there is no criminality involved on the part of the petitioner. If the complaint under Section 138/141 of N.I. Act before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Kolkata is allowed to proceed it will amount to gross abuse of the process of Court/law.
3. It is alleged that the post dated cheque drawn at State Bank of India, Mandi, Gobindgarh, District- Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab bearing No.561491 dated 08.06.2018 for a sum of Rs.6,60,499/- was issued in favour of the opposite party no.1 herein and admittedly the said cheque was signed by the authori
Girdhari Lal Gupta v. D.H. Mehta
National Small Industries Corpn. Ltd. v. Harmeet Singh Paintal
National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. v. Harmeet Singh Paintal
Pooja Ravinder Devidasani v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla
State of Karnataka v. Pratap ChandState of Karnataka v. Pratap Chand
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.