KRISHNA RAO
Sadhana Mehra – Appellant
Versus
Arvind Kumar Jayaswal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Krishna Rao, J.
1. The plaintiff has filed the present application under Order XII, Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying for Judgement and Decree on admission.
2. The plaintiff has filed suit being C.S. No. 95 of 2019 against the defendant for recovery of Khas, peaceful and vacant possession of premises situated on the building known as Power Court situated at the premises No. 20A Abanindra Nath Thakur Sarani, Kolkata.
3. The plaintiff has filed the application for Judgement on admission on the ground that in paragraph 5 (a) of the written statement, the defendant has admitted that:
4. It is also contended that in the written statement the defendant has also admitted the fact that the defendant was inducted by Mr. Mukesh Sood, who by a registered Deed of Gift dated March 26, 2008 has transferred his share along with the share of his mother Pushpavati Sood and his brother Rakesh Sood in the suit premises in favour of the plainti
Ambica Prasad Vs. Mohd. Alam and Another
Karam Kapahi and Others Vs. Lal Chand Public Charitable Trust and Another
Maria Margarida Sequeira Fernandes and Others Vs. Erasmo Jack De Sequeira (Dead) Through Legal Heirs
Nopany Investments (P) Ltd. Vs. Santokh Singh (Huf
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.