RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR
E. D. Enterprises Private Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kaiser Begum – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) :
1. This is an application for judgment on admission. The suit is filed for eviction and mesne profits. The suit premises comprises of the ground floor measuring about 374 sq.ft. (including a mezzanine floor) situated at Premises no.42A, Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata-700020 (“the suit premises”).
2. By a lease agreement executed in January, 2016 by and between the plaintiff and the defendant no.1, the defendant no.1 was inducted as a monthly lessee at a lease rent of Rs.60,000/-(subsequently enhanced to Rs.1,61,000/-). The suit premises is being used by the defendant no.1 for commercial purposes. The defendant no.1 is running a hair salon from the suit premises. Admittedly, the lease agreement is unregistered and insufficiently stamped.
3. It is alleged that, since December 2019, the defendant no.1 stopped paying any rentals in respect of the suit premises. By a notice dated 24 September, 2020 issued under section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the plaintiff sought for eviction of the defendant no.1. Significantly, the defendant no.1 had also instituted a prior suit before the City Civil Court at Calcutta being Title Suit No.571 of 2020
Adhunik Ispat Ltd. vs. Triveni Infrastructure Development Co. Ltd.(2011) 2 CHN 527
Charanjit Lal Mehra vs. Kamal Saroj Mahajan (Smt) (2005) 11 SCC 279
Pradeep Khanna vs Renu Khetarpal (2015) 219 DLT 417
Rajgopal (HUF) vs. the State Bank of India 1999(49) DRJ 285
Payal Vision Limited Vs. Radhika Choudhary (2012) 11 SCC 405
Sukanya Holdings Pvt Ltd. vs. Jayesh H. Pandya (2003) 5 SCC 531
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.