HARISH TANDON, PRASENJIT BISWAS
Kaiser Begum – Appellant
Versus
E. D. Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Harish Tandon, J.) :
1. The judgment on admission is passed by the Single Bench on 28.7.2022 in CS No. 105 of 2021 directing the delivery of khas possession of the scheduled premises being the subject matter of the suit and for Rs. 10,11,500/- towards occupational charges in respect of the said suit premises.
2. Admittedly, the respondent is the owner of a demarcated portion of the ground floor and the mezzanine floor admeasuring approximately 374 sq. ft. super built up area situated at premises no. 42A, Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata -700020. The defendant/appellant was inducted as a tenant for commercial purposes at a rent of Rs. 1,40,000/- per month which was subsequently, enhanced to Rs. 1,61,000/- inclusive of the rent and the amenities charges. The lease agreement was entered into by and between the parties wherefrom it appears that a sum of Rs. 7 lakhs was deposited as security deposit. Pursuant to the said agreement and understanding between the parties, the appellant was put into possession by the respondents for using the said premises for commercial purposes and the rent in respect thereof was being paid from time to time until the default was committed on and f
Hari Steel & General Industries Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Daljit Singh & Ors.
S. M. Asif vs.Virender Kumar Bajaj
Jeevan Diesels & Electricals Ltd. vs. Jasbir Singh Chadha (HUF) & Anr.
Himani Alloys Ltd. vs. Tata Steel Ltd.
Payal Vision Ltd. Vs. Radhika Choudhary (2012) 11 SCC 405
Surjit Sachdev vs. Kazakhstan Investment Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. reported in (1997) 66 DLT 54 (DB)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.