MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, PRASHANT KUMAR
Jai Hanuman Construction Jagdish Saran – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prashant Kumar, J.
1. Heard Shri Anoop Trivedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Vibhu Rai, Abhinav Gaur and Ami Tandon, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri Manish Goel, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Ajit Sinha along with Mr. Anurag Khanna assisted by Ms. Devika Kapoor, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-
(ii) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the decision dated 25.04.2023 passed by respondent no. 6 declaring the result of financial bids.
(iii) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents concerned to constituted a High Level Committee to enquire into the fraud committed anyhow to get the contract awarded to respondent no. 10 by manipulating the data on Prahari website.”
3. The respondent no. 5 had issued an advertisemen
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd v. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited & Anr.
Directorate of Education & Ors v. Educomp Datamatics Ltd. & Ors.
Global Energy Ltd & Another v. M/s Adani Exports Ltd. & Ors. 2005 (4) SCC 435
MaaBinda Express Carrier and Anr v. North-East Frontier Railway and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 760
Michigan Rubber (India) Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
N.G. Projects Ltd. v. Vinod Kumar Jain & Anr. (2022) 6 SCC 127
National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. v. Montecarlo Limited & Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.