ARIJIT BANERJEE, APURBA SINHA RAY
Partha Chongdar – Appellant
Versus
Kolkata Municipal Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Apurba Sinha Ray, J.
Factual Matrix:-
1. A departmental proceeding was initiated against the appellant, an employee of the corporation, by the concerned disciplinary authority of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation. Initially one Sri Chaitanya De Sarkar was appointed as Inquiry Officer but as he submitted resignation from his engagement, one Sri Biswajit Majumder, Director General (Bustee Cell and S.S.E.P) was appointed as the Inquiry Officer. The Inquiry Officer submitted his enquiry report to the Disciplinary Authority but the said authority came to the conclusion that the Inquiry Officer had not specifically dealt with each article of charge and did not express his definite findings on each article of charge/imputations. Accordingly, the Disciplinary Authority vide order dated 04.09.2003 under Memo No. P/12(21)/VI/115/23 set aside the enquiry report dated 10.02.2023 and appointed a new Inquiry Officer to inquire de novo into the charges framed against the delinquent officer, that is, the petitioner/appellant before this Court.
2. The petitioner/appellant challenged the or
Hukam Chand Shyam Lal vs. Union of India and Others
Managing Director, ECIL Hyderabad and Others vs. B. Karunakar and Others
Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr. Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner
Nahar Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors. 1991 (21) DRJ 171 : (1992) II LLJ 573 Del
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.