SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 20

ARIJIT BANERJEE, APURBA SINHA RAY
Partha Chongdar – Appellant
Versus
Kolkata Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:Soumya Majumdar, Shuvasish Sengupta, Soumyajit Mishra, Abhrajit Roy Chowdhury, Advocates. For the Respondents:Alak Kumar Ghosh, Arijit Dey, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Apurba Sinha Ray, J.

Factual Matrix:-

1. A departmental proceeding was initiated against the appellant, an employee of the corporation, by the concerned disciplinary authority of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation. Initially one Sri Chaitanya De Sarkar was appointed as Inquiry Officer but as he submitted resignation from his engagement, one Sri Biswajit Majumder, Director General (Bustee Cell and S.S.E.P) was appointed as the Inquiry Officer. The Inquiry Officer submitted his enquiry report to the Disciplinary Authority but the said authority came to the conclusion that the Inquiry Officer had not specifically dealt with each article of charge and did not express his definite findings on each article of charge/imputations. Accordingly, the Disciplinary Authority vide order dated 04.09.2003 under Memo No. P/12(21)/VI/115/23 set aside the enquiry report dated 10.02.2023 and appointed a new Inquiry Officer to inquire de novo into the charges framed against the delinquent officer, that is, the petitioner/appellant before this Court.

2. The petitioner/appellant challenged the or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top