IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.
Smt. Rekha Ghosh – Petitioner
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Respondents
CRR 912 of 2020 with CRAN 2 of 2022
Decided On : 15-03-2024
Abuse of Process - Criminal Proceedings - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 341/379/506 - The judgment discusses the abuse of criminal proceedings in a civil dispute and the quashing of the proceedings under Sections 341/379/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The court highlighted the lack of evidence to substantiate the allegations and emphasized that the proceedings were an abuse of the process of law.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a long-standing dispute between the parties regarding an extramarital relationship and subsequent criminal proceedings initiated by the parties against each other. The petitioner sought the quashing of the proceedings, alleging fabrication and abuse of the legal process.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the allegations were fabricated and the proceedings were an abuse of the process of law. It emphasized the lack of evidence to substantiate the allegations and concluded that allowing the case to proceed to trial would be against the ends of justice.
Issues: The key issues included the abuse of criminal proceedings in a civil dispute, lack of evidence to support the allegations, and the potential lasting and irremediable loss of prestige for the petitioner if the proceedings were allowed to continue.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles established in previous judgments to determine the abuse of process and lack of evidence in the case. It emphasized the need to consider whether a prima facie case was made out and whether the criminal proceedings were an abuse of the process of law.
Final Decision: The court allowed the revision and quashed the proceedings under Sections 341/379/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, emphasizing that the proceedings were an abuse of the process of law and against the ends of justice.
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
1. The present revision has been preferred praying for quashing of proceedings in G.R. No. 113 of 2019, pending before the Court of the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Arambagh, Hooghly under Sections 341/379/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, arising out of Arambagh Police Station Case No. 39 of 2019, dated January 25, 2019 under Sections 341/379/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and all subsequent orders passed therein.
2. The petitioner states that there are long-standing disputes by and between the parties regarding an illicit extramarital relationship between the sister-in-law (JAA) of the present Petitioner and Opposite Party No.2 herein, as the husband of the said sister-in-law and the Opposite Party No.2 herein have been long time business partners. Thereafter, the present Petitioner’s said sister-in-law refused to continue the said extramarital relationship. A criminal proceeding, being Jamalpur Police Station Case No. 186 of 2011 dated 17.12.2011 under Sections 452/406/505/565/379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was instituted by the husband of the present Petitioner, which is still pending adjudication.
3. That in retaliation thereto, the Opposite Party No.2 herein, out of erstwhile grudge, had started threatening her and all her family members of dire consequences and had even consequently, instituted criminal proceedings, being Arambagh Police Station Case No. 618 of 2014 dated 28.06.2014 under Sections 448/323/325/307/354/379/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, against not only the husband of the present Petitioner but also against the Petitioner.
4. That at the time of filing the Charge-Sheet in connection therewith, being Charge-Sheet No. 507 of 2014 dated 31.07.2014, the present Petitioner was not Charge-sheeted and hence, discharged.
5. That in furtherance of the aforesaid existing rivalries and disputes, on 09.07.2018, the Opposite Party No.2 herein filed a Complaint Case, being C.R. Case No. 151/18, before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Arambagh, Hooghly, against the present Petitioner and her sister-in-law with similar and/or identical allegations, which the Learned Court by an Order dated 30.08.2018 was pleased to dismiss under Section 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with the observation that the allegations made therein were utterly baseless.
6. That still unsatisfied with vengeance, the Opposite Party No.2 herein has instituted another frivolous criminal proceedings, (the present case) being Arambagh Police Station Case No. 39 of 2019 dated 25.01.2019 under Sections 341/379/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the present Petitioner and her sister-in-law.
7. The allegations and accusations, as leveled therein by the Opposite Party No.2 herein against the present Petitioner and others are as follows:-
8. The Petitioner states that the accusations, as leveled against her, are nothing but fabrication and have been contrived, concocted and made by the Opposite Party No.2 herein, in connivance with his family-members, only with a view to harass and torture the present Petitioner and her family members and to implicate them in no
Union of India Vs. Prafulla Kumar Samal & Another
State of Orissa Vs. Debendra Nath Padhi
Fiona Shrikhande Vs. State of Maharashtra & Another
Nagawwa v. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi
Manik Taneja and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Another
Govind Prasad Kejriwal vs The State of Bihar & Anr., AIR 2020 SC 1079
The main legal point established in the judgment is the abuse of criminal proceedings in a civil dispute and the requirement to consider whether a prima facie case is made out and whether the proceed....
While considering discharge application, Court is to exercise its judicial mind to determine whether a case for trial has been made out or not – In such proceedings, Court is not to hold mini trial b....
The court held that allegations of defamation and criminal intimidation lacked substance and failed to meet the necessary legal criteria under IPC Sections 500 and 506.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that allegations in a family property dispute lacked prima facie evidence of the accused committing the alleged offences, and the Magistrate's non-....
The court quashed criminal proceedings for trespass and intimidation, highlighting that allegations lacked required intent and could be deemed malicious, thereby abusing the legal process.
Criminal intimidation requires specific threats intended to induce alarm; general expressions of sympathy do not establish the basis for charges under relevant sections of IPC.
Criminal proceedings cannot be initiated for civil disputes; a prima facie case must exist to avoid abuse of legal processes.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of establishing the essential ingredients of alleged offenses and the court's power to quash proceedings if the allegations do not constitute a prima facie case....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.