Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Suresh Chand Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case involving abduction and rape allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on erroneous charge framing by the trial court. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the sufficiency of evidence for charges. (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 17 , 20 , 22) |
| 4. legal standards for framing charges under ipc and cr.p.c. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. conclusion declaring discharge of petitioners under ipc. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
1. The instant revision petition under Sections 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.") has been filed by petitioners against the impugned order dated 27.08.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge ("ASJ"), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in SC No. 85/2018 whereby learned ASJ was pleased to frame the charge against the petitioners under Sections 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC").
2. The brief facts of the case are that on the basis of complaint filed by the complainant/respondent no. 2/prosecutrix, an FIR bearing no. 130/2015, was registered at Police Station ("P.S.") Mansarover Park, North-East District, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sectio
Criminal intimidation requires specific threats intended to induce alarm; general expressions of sympathy do not establish the basis for charges under relevant sections of IPC.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of prima facie material in framing charges and highlights the need for evidence to support allegations of criminal acts.
The limited scope of inquiry at the stage of framing charges and the prima facie nature of the offences were central legal principles established in the judgment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the abuse of criminal proceedings in a civil dispute and the requirement to consider whether a prima facie case is made out and whether the proceed....
The charge should be considered groundless only if there is no basis or foundation in evidence.
While considering discharge application, Court is to exercise its judicial mind to determine whether a case for trial has been made out or not – In such proceedings, Court is not to hold mini trial b....
The court quashed criminal proceedings for trespass and intimidation, highlighting that allegations lacked required intent and could be deemed malicious, thereby abusing the legal process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
