SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 502

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J.
IN THE MATTER OF
Rahit Kundu – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.A. No. – 11543 of 2022
Decided on : 12-02-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Partha Sarathi Bhattacharya , Adv., Mr. Md. Alauddin Mondal, Adv., Mr. Raju Bhattacharya, Adv., Mr. Arunava Matiy,Adv., Ms. Debjani Sengupta
For the Respondent: Mr. Kumar Jyoti Tewari, Adv. Mr. Somntah Ghosal, Adv. Mr. Subha Senapati Adv.
For the WBUHS : DN Maiti
For National Medical Commission : Mr. Indranil Roy, Adv., Mr. Sumit Kumar Roy Adv.

The authority of the medical board to determine disability for admission into medical courses and the importance of adhering to the timeline for the admission process as set by the Hon'ble Apex Court.

Headnote:

NEET - Disability Assessment - [Persons with Disability Act, 1995, Section 3(1)] - [Persons with Disability Act, 1995, Section 39] - [Medical Council of India Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997, Regulation 4(3)] - The court upheld the authority of the medical board to determine disability for admission into medical courses and emphasized the importance of adhering to the admission process timeline set by the Hon'ble Apex Court. The petitioner's challenge to the disability certificate issued by the medical board was dismissed, and the court refused to entertain the petitioner's prayer due to the closure of the admission process for NEET (UG) 2021.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the disability certificate issued by a medical board for the National Eligibility-Cum Entrance Test (UG) 2021, seeking admission to a medical course. The petitioner's disability percentage was assessed differently by two medical institutions, leading to the challenge.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the disability certificate, upholding the authority of the medical board to determine disability for admission into medical courses. The court refused to entertain the petitioner's prayer due to the closure of the admission process for NEET (UG) 2021.

Issues: Dispute over the assessment of the petitioner's disability percentage and its impact on admission to a medical course. The timeliness of the petitioner's challenge and the closure of the admission process for NEET (UG) 2021.

Ratio Decidendi: The medical board has the authority to determine disability for admission into medical courses. Adherence to the timeline set for the admission process is crucial to avoid affecting medical education and public health.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the disability certificate and refused to entertain the prayer, citing the closure of the admission process for NEET (UG) 2021.

JUDGMENT :

Subhendu Samanta, J.

1. The present writ petitioner participated in the National Eligibility-Cum Entrance Test (UG) 2021 ( in short NEET) under the general category and sub-category of persons with disability (in Short PHD) category. The NEET Test (UG 21) held on 12.09.2021.

2. He obtained 170 marks out of 720 marks. He appeared in the examination with the disability certificate issued by the Burdwan Medical College Hospital on 22.01.2020. wherein the petitioners percentage of disability was mentioned as 50%.

3. The petitioner was ranked in the merit list under the PHD category as “1806” in such Test.

4. Thereafter, the petitioner appeared on 1st February 2022 before the Medical Board of IPGMER SSKM hospital for assessment of her disability. The said board of IPGMER issued disability certificate to the petitioner wherein the percentage of disability was stated to be 11% as loco-motor disability and he became not qualified. Challenging the said certificate the instant writ petition was preferred.

5. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the medical board of IPGMER SSKM Hospital has wrongly assessed the disability of the present petitioner. The petitioner was treated in Burdwan Medical college and Hospital thereafter the authorities of the said Burdwan medical College Hospital gave the disability certificate to the petitioner stating his percentage of disability to be 50%. The medical board of IPGMER has wrongly assessed the disability of the present petitioner and come to an erroneous conclusion. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the present petitioner is a successful candidate in NEET (UG 21) examination. So, the necessary direction may given to continue his study in the medical course.

6. Learned Advocte Mr. Indranil Roy appearing for the National Medical Commission submits that the prayer of the present petitioner cannot be considered at this stage. The Hon’ble Apex Court has already decided the issue of last date of admission of the students in NEET 2021. By virtue of its decision of Ashish Ranjan And Ors Vs. Union of India (2016) 11 SCC 225 the Hon’vle Apex Court has held that “30st August 2022” would be the last date for admission of students in NEET 2021. Thereafter the said order was modified by the Hon’ble Apex Court on the prayer of the Union of India vide Miscellaneous application No. 1822 of 2022 in WP (c) No. 76/2015.

7. Time for completion of admission process for NEET (UG) 2022-23 was mentioned as 20th December 2022. It is further directed that the date of commencement of Academic sessions for UG course was on 15th November 2022.

8. Thus the present petitioner has lost his chance and is prayer cannot be entertained at this stage. Mr. Roy cited a decision upon Hon’ble Apex Court in Dr. Asha Goyel and Ors vs. Medical Counselling Committee & Ors. reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 734.

9. Wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court has held that

    24. The Process of admission and that too in the medical education cannot be endless. It must end at a particular point of time. The time schedule has to be adhered to, otherwise, ultimately, it may affect the medical education and the public health.

    10. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of Union of India submits that the Honble Apex Court in Purswani Asutosh Vs. Union of India (2019) 14 SCC 422 has held that :

      Candidates who considered themselves eligible for this category are advised to ensure their eligibility by getting themselves examined at any Government Medical College/ District Hospital /Government Hospital. However, candidates may kindly note that in case of selection under PH category, they will be required to produce disability certificate from one of the disability assessment boards, constituted at the four metro cities, mentioned below, before their scheduled date of counseliing:

    i) Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, Ansari Nagar, Ring Road, New Delhi 110 029(Tel No. 011-26190763 & 26163072)

    ii) All India Institute of Physical Me

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top