IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J.
IN THE MATTER OF
Rahit Kundu – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.A. No. – 11543 of 2022
Decided on : 12-02-2024
NEET - Disability Assessment - [Persons with Disability Act, 1995, Section 3(1)] - [Persons with Disability Act, 1995, Section 39] - [Medical Council of India Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997, Regulation 4(3)] - The court upheld the authority of the medical board to determine disability for admission into medical courses and emphasized the importance of adhering to the admission process timeline set by the Hon'ble Apex Court. The petitioner's challenge to the disability certificate issued by the medical board was dismissed, and the court refused to entertain the petitioner's prayer due to the closure of the admission process for NEET (UG) 2021.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the disability certificate issued by a medical board for the National Eligibility-Cum Entrance Test (UG) 2021, seeking admission to a medical course. The petitioner's disability percentage was assessed differently by two medical institutions, leading to the challenge.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the disability certificate, upholding the authority of the medical board to determine disability for admission into medical courses. The court refused to entertain the petitioner's prayer due to the closure of the admission process for NEET (UG) 2021.
Issues: Dispute over the assessment of the petitioner's disability percentage and its impact on admission to a medical course. The timeliness of the petitioner's challenge and the closure of the admission process for NEET (UG) 2021.
Ratio Decidendi: The medical board has the authority to determine disability for admission into medical courses. Adherence to the timeline set for the admission process is crucial to avoid affecting medical education and public health.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the disability certificate and refused to entertain the prayer, citing the closure of the admission process for NEET (UG) 2021.
JUDGMENT :
Subhendu Samanta, J.
1. The present writ petitioner participated in the National Eligibility-Cum Entrance Test (UG) 2021 ( in short NEET) under the general category and sub-category of persons with disability (in Short PHD) category. The NEET Test (UG 21) held on 12.09.2021.
2. He obtained 170 marks out of 720 marks. He appeared in the examination with the disability certificate issued by the Burdwan Medical College Hospital on 22.01.2020. wherein the petitioners percentage of disability was mentioned as 50%.
3. The petitioner was ranked in the merit list under the PHD category as “1806” in such Test.
4. Thereafter, the petitioner appeared on 1st February 2022 before the Medical Board of IPGMER SSKM hospital for assessment of her disability. The said board of IPGMER issued disability certificate to the petitioner wherein the percentage of disability was stated to be 11% as loco-motor disability and he became not qualified. Challenging the said certificate the instant writ petition was preferred.
5. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the medical board of IPGMER SSKM Hospital has wrongly assessed the disability of the present petitioner. The petitioner was treated in Burdwan Medical college and Hospital thereafter the authorities of the said Burdwan medical College Hospital gave the disability certificate to the petitioner stating his percentage of disability to be 50%. The medical board of IPGMER has wrongly assessed the disability of the present petitioner and come to an erroneous conclusion. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the present petitioner is a successful candidate in NEET (UG 21) examination. So, the necessary direction may given to continue his study in the medical course.
6. Learned Advocte Mr. Indranil Roy appearing for the National Medical Commission submits that the prayer of the present petitioner cannot be considered at this stage. The Hon’ble Apex Court has already decided the issue of last date of admission of the students in NEET 2021. By virtue of its decision of Ashish Ranjan And Ors Vs. Union of India (2016) 11 SCC 225 the Hon’vle Apex Court has held that “30st August 2022” would be the last date for admission of students in NEET 2021. Thereafter the said order was modified by the Hon’ble Apex Court on the prayer of the Union of India vide Miscellaneous application No. 1822 of 2022 in WP (c) No. 76/2015.
7. Time for completion of admission process for NEET (UG) 2022-23 was mentioned as 20th December 2022. It is further directed that the date of commencement of Academic sessions for UG course was on 15th November 2022.
8. Thus the present petitioner has lost his chance and is prayer cannot be entertained at this stage. Mr. Roy cited a decision upon Hon’ble Apex Court in Dr. Asha Goyel and Ors vs. Medical Counselling Committee & Ors. reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 734.
9. Wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court has held that
10. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of Union of India submits that the Honble Apex Court in Purswani Asutosh Vs. Union of India (2019) 14 SCC 422 has held that :
i) Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, Ansari Nagar, Ring Road, New Delhi 110 029(Tel No. 011-26190763 & 26163072)
ii) All India Institute of Physical Me
The authority of the medical board to determine disability for admission into medical courses and the importance of adhering to the timeline for the admission process as set by the Hon'ble Apex Court....
Proper examination and adherence to guidelines for granting disability certificates are crucial, especially in the context of admission to medical courses.
Exclusion from admission despite valid disability certification violates rights and mandates of reasonable accommodation under disability laws.
The court prioritizes functional competency over rigid disability percentages in educational admissions for disabled candidates.
The court ruled that disability must be fairly assessed, emphasizing eligibility for medical courses should not be automatically disqualified based on disability alone.
Disability quantification should not disqualify candidates from medical education; functional competency must be assessed for eligibility.
The court upheld the validity of amended eligibility regulations for medical admissions requiring intact limbs and functional competency, emphasizing adherence to application timelines as lawful and ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.