IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY, J.
State of West Bengal – Petitioner
Versus
Santosh Kumar Sah – Respondent
CRR No. 79 of 2024
Decided On : 25-04-2024
Indian Forest Act - Confiscation of Forest Produce - Section 59A, Section 59D - The court discussed the provisions of Section 59A and Section 59D of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, which provide for the confiscation of forest produce and the right to appeal. The court highlighted the discretionary power of the forest officer to order confiscation and the requirement for reasonable exercise of such power. It also emphasized the provision that no order of confiscation shall be made if the owner proves that the tool, rope, chain, boat, vehicle, or cattle was used without their knowledge or connivance.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a state authority, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the order of the Learned Sessions Judge, which set aside the order of confiscation of a vehicle involved in illegal collection and removal of forest produce. The petitioner contended that the appeal should have been registered as a civil appeal and not a criminal appeal, and that the order was perverse and not based on sound judicial reasoning.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appeal should have been treated as a civil appeal due to the nature of the order under Section 59A of the Indian Forest Act, and that the procedural irregularity could be cured. It also held that the application, although filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., should be considered under Article 227 of the Constitution to ascertain if the impugned order was totally perverse and devoid of reasons. The court dismissed the application, stating that the order passed by the Appellate Court did not require any interference.
Issues: The issues raised in the case included the maintainability of the application under law, the jurisdiction of the court passing the impugned order, and the validity of the order passed in an appeal under Section 59D of the West Bengal Forest Amendment Act 1988.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for reasonable exercise of discretionary power by the forest officer in ordering confiscation of forest produce and the requirement for proof by the owner to prevent confiscation of tools, ropes, chains, boats, vehicles, or cattle used without their knowledge or connivance.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the application, stating that the order passed by the Learned Appellate Court did not require any interference.
JUDGMENT :
BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY, J.
1. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the Petitioner against the Order dated 20thDecember 2023 passed by Ld. Sessions Judge Kalimpong West Bengal in Criminal Appeal No. 06 of 2023, arising out of Forest Case For/Vehicle/N.R. 15 of 2023-2024. Learned Sessions Judge by the said order was pleased to set aside Order dated 17-10-2023 passed in Forest Case No. FOR/VEHICLE/ NR-15/2023 and direct DFO Kalimpong to release the vehicle in favour of registered owner by 28-12-2023. The Petitioner State of West Bengal being aggrieved by the said order has come up with the instant application.
2. The case of the petitioner in brief is that on 12/05/2023 at about 8.30 am Sri Promod Tamang DRM, the Beat Officer of Gorubathan West, Neora Range, with his staff namely 1. Sri Shyamol Mardi FG. 2. Jit Bahadur Biswakarma, FW and Bivek Prodhan, RDC of Gorubathan Beat went to patrolling duty at the compartment No. Mal-9. Gorubathan Beat, Neora Range. At about 9 a.m. in Chel river bed, Compartment No. Mal-9, Gorubathan Beat, they saw one truck bearing Registration No. WB-71A8518 collecting stone boulder from the reserve forest area, at compartment No. Mal-9 (GPS-N 26’55’ 54.25” E 88 40’ 00.68”) under Gorubathan Beat. Promod Tamang, DRM, Beat Officer asked them to stop and produce any permit license/documents for collection and removal of Forest Produce (Stone Boulder) from the reserve forest areas. At that time the driver of the vehicle and other persons present there managed to flee away from the spot. Thereafter Promod Tamang DRM beat officer Gorubathan Beat seized, the vehicle (truck bearing Registration No. WB-71A-8518 on proper seizure list and the forest produce (Stone Boulder of 200 CFT) loaded thereon under Section 52 of Indian Forest Act, 1927 at about 9:15 am and brought the same to the Range Office. After the seizure was complete the Beat Officer, Gorubathan Beat, under Neora Range intimated the officer-in-charge, Gorubathan Police Station, Kalimpong in writing about the incident on 12/05/2023. On the same day a letter was issued to the Regional Transport Officer Jalpaiguri District seeking information as to the ownership of the seized vehicle bearing registration No. WB-71A-8518 which was apprehended on 12/05/2023 illegally carrying forest produce. Upon obtaining a written report dated 16/05/2023 regarding seizure of truck bearing registration No. WB-71A-8518, a notice of 30 days was issued to the opposite party being owner of vehicle bearing registration No. WB-71A-8518. Upon receipt of the notice the opposite Party submitted a written explanation on 06/06/2023 by annexing Photostat copy of a Road E-Challan for sand/riverbed materials Transport bearing Challan No. 6207813/S/23-24/110520 230200/PS Dated 11/05/2023 issued against a vehicle bearing registration No. WB-73D7325. The Authorized officer and DFO, Kalimpong upon not being satisfied with, the explanation given issued notice upon the opposite party for personal hearing. In the personal hearing statement of the witnesses and the opposite Party was recorded. Upon hearing the opposite party and considering the statement of the witnesses the Authorized Officer and Divisional Forest Officer Kalimpong was pleased to confiscate the said vehicle bearing registration No. WB-71A-8518 vide order dated 17/10/2023.
3. The opposite Party being aggrieved by the Order of Confiscation preferred an appeal before Learned Sessions Judge Kalimpong and the same was registered as Criminal Appeal No. 06 of 2923. Learned Sessions Judge upon contested hearing was pleased to allow the appeal and set aside the order of the Authorized Officer and Divisional Forest Officer Kalimpong inter alia with a direction upon the Divisional Forest Officer, Kalimpong to release the vehicle in favour of the registered owner by 28/12/2023.
4. The Petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 20th December 2023 passed by Learned Sessions Judge, Kalim
Deepak Tandon vs. Rajesh Kumar Gupta
General Insurance Council vs. State of A.P. (2010) 6 SCC 768
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for reasonable exercise of discretionary power by the forest officer in ordering confiscation of forest produce and the provision f....
Point of Law : 14. Vehicle seized for committing forest offence was not normally to be released to party till culmination of all proceedings in respect of forest offence as particular approach in mat....
Point of Law : 18. Vehicle seized for committing forest offence was not normally to be released to party till culmination of all proceedings in respect of forest offence as particular approach in mat....
Point of Law : 19. Vehicle seized for committing forest offence was not normally to be released to party till culmination of all proceedings in respect of forest offence as particular approach in mat....
Point of law : 14. Vehicle seized for committing forest offence was not normally to be released to the party till culmination of all proceedings in respect of forest offence as particular approach in....
Administrative property seizure is a temporary measure pending criminal conviction. Excessive, unexplained delay in investigation violates the constitutional right to a speedy trial, justifying the q....
Confiscation under the Orissa Forest Act requires proof of a forest offence and adherence to procedural safeguards, failure of which invalidates the confiscation order.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.