SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 698

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SANTOSH KUMAR NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

SANJEEB K. PANIGRAHI, J.

1. The Petitioner, in the present Writ Petition, seeks quashing of the order dated 12.08.2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Nayagarh in F.A.O. No. 7 of 2025, and the order dated 13.05.2025 passed by the Authorised Officer-cum-Assistant Conservator of Forests, Nayagarh in O.R. Case No. 12K of 2024–25, purportedly in exercise of powers under Section 56 of the Orissa Forest Act, 1972.

I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE:

2. Succinctly put, the facts of the case as narrated by the petitioner are as follows:

(i) The petitioner had purchased a tractor along with a trolley by availing finance from a private financial institution. The said tractor–trolley was duly registered, the tractor bearing Registration No. OD-25-L-6493 and the trolley bearing Registration No. OD-25-L-6545, and the petitioner is the registered owner of the aforesaid vehicle.

(ii) The petitioner had handed over his vehicle to the driver at the relevant point of time under a bona fide belief and in good faith, having regard to the past conduct of the said driver and the smooth management of the vehicle.

(iii) On 24.12.2023 at about 2.00 p.m., upon receiving information from a reliable sour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top