IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
JAY SENGUPTA, J.
Bishnu Kumar Chettri & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents
WPA 24441 of 2014, CAN 1 of 2019, (Old No. CAN 570 of 2019)
Decided On : 27-06-2023
Land Acquisition - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 4, Section 5 - The court directed the respondents to initiate a fresh proceeding under the Act of 2013 for acquisition of the land already taken over by the respondents BRO/GREF for construction of road and pay appropriate compensation to the petitioners in respect of the land taken over, within a period of four months from the date of communication of this order.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners alleged forcible dispossession by the respondents without notice and prayed for damages and restoration of possession. The respondents claimed that the land was required for road construction and widening of immense strategic importance. The LA Department was accused of sitting idle and ignoring the strategic project.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the land of the petitioners was utilized by the respondents without initiation of any proceeding under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The road was constructed, and the money deposited was only on an ad-hoc estimate. The court concluded that the respondents had caused gross violation of the petitioners' rights guaranteed by Articles 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India.
Issues: Forcible dispossession, unauthorized land utilization, violation of constitutional rights, failure to initiate land acquisition proceeding
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the respondents had deprived the petitioners of their property without due process of law, and directed the respondents to initiate a fresh proceeding under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for determining compensation and payment thereof.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to initiate a fresh proceeding under the Act of 2013 for acquisition of the land already taken over by the respondents BRO/GREF for construction of road and pay appropriate compensation to the petitioners in respect of the land taken over, within a period of four months from the date of communication of this order.
JUDGMENT :
Jay Sengupta, J.
1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities to stop illegal digging or any other construction work in the land of the petitioners, to pay compensation to the petitioners for the damage caused and to restore possession of the land and in the alternative, to pay compensation to the petitioners for the land taken over at the present market value.
2. Mr. Subba, learned appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submitted as follows. The petitioner no. 1 became the owner of about 1.82 acres of land as contained in plots that were conveyed by a deed of purchase dated 19.03.2007. By a deed of gift dated 06.10.2007, some portion was then conveyed to the petitioner nos. 2 and 3. All of a sudden the petitioners found that the Army authorities were digging up their land and doing construction work there with the help of cranes and machinery without any prior notice to or consent of the petitioners. The petitioners protested and the work stopped for the time being. The valuation of the said plot was purportedly Rs. 25 lakhs at that time. In view of the above, the petitioners prayed for release of their land and if the same was found impossible because of utilisation, for compensation under the new Act of 2013 as also for the damage suffered by the petitioners in the meantime.
3. Mr. Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5, submitted as follows. The initial road sector Damdim Gorubathan measuring 13.100 kms. was constructed by the West Bengal Public Works Department. The road sector was handed over to the Border Road Organization during October, 1968 after the heavy floods and consequent damages to the word sector. From Gorubathan to Algarh, there was a mule track. The road was improved to CL-9 specifications by the Border Road Organization after 1968. The old road Kalimpong Lahasa Trade Route via Jelepa was developed to class 9 specification upto Rishi by the West Bengal Public Works Department during 1963-1964. The road, Damdim Algarh was a vital line of communication of Army convoy during emergencies. The road was an alternative route to Gangtok and served as main line of communication of civil population of West Bengal and all parts of State Sikkim during road blocks on NH-31A (Sevoke Gangtok Road). The road was very important for the national security and integrity of the Union of India and it served the purpose of effective defence. The existing land width available, i.e. road reserve land as per the register of GREF, which was a part of auditable documents, was 80 feet for the particular road from KM 0.00 to 68.00. Construction/improvement of the road Damdim Algarah Rishi from class 9 to National Highway double lane specifications was required due to increase in the volume of traffic intensity, requirements of Sikkim Government and strategic importance of China Border. The road was also used for plying to Sikkim when NH was blocked due to heavy landslide during monsoon season. The land acquisition for the improvement of road between km. 20.00 to km. 49.00 had been jointly carried out with the Land Acquisition Department, Darjeeling (West Bengal) during the year 2009. Based on the survey a proposal for acquisition of 27.86 acres of land for widening of road Damdim to Algarh, the tentative estimate amount of Rs. 2,45,17,160/-(Rupees two crores forty five lakhs seventeen thousand one hundred and sixty only) had been reimbursed and same was remitted to the office of the Collector, Darjeeling, Land Acquisition Department, Government of West Bengal vide 87 RCC letter No. 2681/24/E2 dated 19th December 2011 through Defence Cheque bearing No. K-912374 dated 15th December 2011, for further disbursement of affected land owners. In order to expedite payment to land owners, all efforts had been taken and further the correspondence made with the District Magistrate, Darjeeling. In different paragraphs of the opposition filed by
The court emphasized the importance of due process of law and the right to fair compensation in land acquisition proceedings, as guaranteed by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land ....
Forceful dispossession and use of private land for public purpose without following due process of law violates the constitutional right under Article 300A, and delay cannot negate the claim for comp....
The acquisition proceedings under Award No.12/83 were held not to lapse in terms of Sec. 24(2) of the RFCTLARR Act and they will continue.
The court affirmed that the right to property is a human right, requiring lawful acquisition and compensation when expropriated, underlining legal obligations of the State in welfare contexts.
Landowners have a constitutional right to compensation for land utilized for public projects, and claims cannot be dismissed based on implied consent or delay in seeking redress.
Landowners whose land is acquired for public purposes are entitled to fair compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act,....
The court emphasized that the petitioners' claims lacked merit as no land was released in favor of private builders, and the petitioners' grievances were based on disputed questions of facts.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.