IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SOUMEN SEN, UDAY KUMAR, JJ.
State of West Bengal - Appellant
Versus
Somnath Ghosh & Ors. – Respondents
MAT 586 of 2022 with I.A No. CAN 1 of 2022 with MAT 773 of 2022 with I.A No. CAN 3 of 2022
Decided On : 19-10-2023
Transfer of Teachers - Jurisdictional Issue - West Bengal School Service Commission Act, 1997, West Bengal Madrasha School Service Commission Act, 2008 - Section 10A, 10B, 10C - Summary of Acts and Sections
Fact of the Case:
The appeal arises from an order directing the Principal Secretary to consider the right of teachers appointed prior to the introduction of the West Bengal Madrasha Service Commission Act in 2008 for general transfer under the West Bengal School Service Commission Act, 1997. The School Education Department and West Bengal Minority Affairs and Madrasha Education Department are aggrieved by the impugned order.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the School Education Department had no jurisdiction to consider the transfer application, as the recruitment policies and service conditions are governed by two different statutes, and the School Education Department had lost control over the Madrasha due to the bifurcation of jurisdiction.
Issues: The principal issue was whether teachers appointed under the 1997 Act could insist on their application being processed by the School Service Commission applying the general transfer rules under the said act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the terms and conditions of service of teachers in Madrasha in employment before the 2008 Act should not be varied to their disadvantage. The transfer rules under the 2008 Act were prior to the transfer rules framed under the 1997 Act, and the teachers transferred from the School Service Commission in 2008 were to be governed by the 2010 Rules. The School Education Department had no authority or jurisdiction to consider the transfer application of a teacher who had joined Madrasha from the School Service Commission in 2008, and their service conditions were to be governed by 2010 and 2023 Rules.
Final Decision: The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals succeeded.
JUDGMENT :
Soumen Sen, J.
1. The appeal is arising out of an order dated 22nd February,2022 in which the learned Single Judge directed the Principal Secretary to the School Education Department to give an opportunity of hearing to the Madrasha Service Commission and the petitioners in order to consider the right of the petitioners as teachers who were appointed prior to the introduction of the west Bengal Madrasha Service Commission Act in 2008 and pass a reasoned order keeping in mind that the teachers of the institutions, which were given special rights to appoint their own teachers and not by the School Service Commission (like Ramkrishna Mission) have been given the right recently to get the advantage of the General transfer.
2. Although the said order appears to be innocuous but having regard to the important question raised with regard to the jurisdiction of the Principal Secretary of School Education Department to consider the representation for general transfer of teachers recruited prior to coming into force of the Madrasha Commission Act, it needs to be decided whether after their service have been transferred to Madrasha Schools their case can be considered for general transfer under the West Bengal School Service Commission Act, 1997 (in short ‘1997 Act’), although they were all recruited under the School Service Commission Act that, is to say, prior to the bifurcation.
3. Both the School Education Department and West Bengal Minority Affairs an Madrasha Education Department are aggrieved by the impugned order.
4. The appellants are represented by Mr. Advocate General. The Advocate General has given a brief background of the relevant statute applicable in the present case.
5. The West Bengal School Service Commission Act, 1997 was promulgated on 1st April, 1997 with no provision for transfer like Section 10A, 10B and 10C recently introduced and upheld by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this court.
6. During 2006-07 the writ petitioners were appointed by the respective managing committee of Madrasha, as assistant teacher in Madrasha on the recommendation of School Service Commission.
7. Mr. Advocate General has referred to paragraph 2 of the writ petition where the details of the appointments of the West Bengal have been mentioned.
8. On 22nd October, 2008 the West Bengal Madrasha School Service Commission Act, 2008 (in short ‘2008 Act’) was promulgated.
9. The 1997 Act was amended wherein the word "Madrasah" was excluded from the definition of "school" in Section 2(n) and the words "Madrasah Teacher" were excluded from the definition of Teacher" in Section 2(p).
10. Section 8 of the 2008 Act was amended on 9th June, 2010 to include transfer of teachers/non teaching staff of the Madrasa Service Commission. The West Bengal Madrasah Service Commission Recruitment (Selection and recommendation of persons for Appointment and Transfer to the Post of Teacher and Non-Teaching Staff) Rules, 2010 has been promulgated on 12th November, 2010 under Section 18, read with, inter alia section 8 of the 2008 Act. Rule 33 of the said Rules sets out the procedure for transfer of Madrasah Teachers.
11. Section 10(B) was inserted in the 1997 Act on 11th July, 2013 w.e.f. 20th January, 2014, thereby introducing general transfer of teachers in schools. The West Bengal School Service Commission (General Transfer) Rules, 2013 was promulgated on 3rd October, 2013 under Section 17, read with Section 10(B) of the 1997 Act (2013). The West Bengal School Service Commission (General Transfer, Transfer on Special Grounds and Reallocation) Rules, 2015 was promulgated on 27th February, 2015 in supersession of the 2013 Rules. On 28th June, 2021 the Utsashree online transfer portal was introduced, to give an opportunity to teachers in schools to apply for transfer to any school in the State of their choice.
12. A writ petition bearing WPA No. 1202 of 2022 was filed by various teachers appointed to Madrasahs as per recommendation of the West Bengal School
Chandigarh Administration and Ors. vs. Jagjit Singh and Ors.
Union of India (UOI) and Ors. vs. Ram Kumar Thakur
Sk. Md. Rafique vs. Managing Committee, Contai Rahamania High Madrasah and Ors.
The court clarified the jurisdictional issue and upheld the application of the transfer rules under the 2008 Act for teachers appointed prior to the introduction of the Act, emphasizing the loss of c....
The transfer order was issued in violation of the statutory rule requiring a no objection certificate from the Head of the institution of the parent school and non-consideration of the effect of the ....
The court determined that a teacher's transfer based on claims of being a 'Victim of Crime' was invalid due to lack of corroborating evidence and the failure to meet statutory requirements under tran....
The court held that the order of transfer was illegal and quashed it, directing the competent authority to take a decision afresh in strict compliance with the law. The court also directed the appell....
The management of educational institutions has the discretion to transfer employees from unaided to aided posts, and employees do not possess a vested right to demand such transfers under the MEPS Ac....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.