SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 956

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
HARISH TANDON, PRASENJIT BISWAS, JJ.
Rabin Tudu – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal & ors. – Respondent
WPA/13628/2018 with WPO/41/2020 with WPO/306/2020
Decided on : 27-07-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Jayanta Mitra, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ashoke Kumar Banerjee, Sr. Adv., Mr. Pratik Dhar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Subir Sanyal, Adv., Mr. Ekramul Bari, Adv., Mr. S.M. Ali, Adv., Mr. Anindya Bose, Adv., Mr. Diptendu Mondal, Adv., Mr. Subhrangsu Panda, Adv., Ms. Ina Bhattacharya, Adv., Ms. Mithu Singha Mahapatra, Adv., Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Adv., Ms. Bina Baidya, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Bose, Adv., Mr. Biswarup Biswas, Adv., Mr. Gora Chand Samanta, Adv., Mr. Nirmalendu Bera, Adv., Mr. Sakti Pada Jana, Adv., Mr. Subhajyoti Das, Adv., Mr. Partha Sarkar, Adv., Mr. Abhi jit Basu, Adv., Mr. Ujjal Ray, Adv., Mr. Arpa Chakraborty, Adv., Mr. Sk. Abdur Rahim, Adv., Mr. Arun Kumar Maiti (Mohanty), Adv., Mrs. Kaberi Sengupta Mohanty, Adv., Mr. R. R. Mohanty, Adv., Ms. Iqra Rahaman, Adv., Mr. Sumit Shaw, Adv., Ms. Snigdha Ghosh, Adv., Mr. Shivam Saha, Adv., Mr. Ratul Biswas, Adv., Ms. Sumouli Sarkar, Adv., Mr. Sagnik Roy Chowdhury, Adv., Mr. Syed Mausum Ali, Adv., Mr. Falguni Bandyopadhyay, Adv., Mr. Subir Chakraborty, Adv., Mr. Suman Sengupta, Adv., Mr. Tapash Maity, Adv., Mr. Dip Jyoti Chakraborty, Adv., Mr. Tamal Taru Panda, Adv., Mr. Arnab Sinha, Adv., Mr. Amartya Basu, Adv., Ms. Suchita Bhattacharya, Adv., Mr. Ramen Bose, Adv., Mr. Banibrata Dutta, Adv., Mr. Aktaruzzaman, Adv., Mr. Uday Shankar Chattopadhyay, Adv., Mr. Suman Sankar Chetterjee, Adv., Mr. Santanu Majhi, Adv., Ms. Trisha Rakshit, Adv., Mr. Pronay Basak, Adv., Mr. Subhayu Das, Adv., Mr. Samir Halder, Adv., Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta, Adv., Mr. Arka Nandi , Adv., Mr. Sandwip Sutradhar, Adv., Mr. Kartik Kumar Roy, Adv., Mr. Debranjan Das, Adv., Mr. Samrat Chowdhury, Adv., Mr. Gouranga Debnath, Adv., Ms. Swagata Datta, Adv., Mr. Suman Banerjee, Adv., Ms. Munmun Tewari, Adv., Mr. Sk. Imtiaj Uddin, Adv., For the State: Mr. S.N. Mookherjee, Ld. Adv., General Mr. Anirban Ray, Ld. Govt. Pleader Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Ld. AGP Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Ld. Jr.Standing Counsel Mr. Bhsakar Prasad Vaisya, Ld. AGP Mr. Swapan Kumar Datta, Ld. AGP Mr. Md. T. M. Siddiqui, Ld. AGP Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mullick, Adv., Mr. Pantu Deb Roy, Adv., Mr. Malay Singh, Adv., Mr. Sk. Md. Galib, Adv., Mr. Santanu Kumar Mitra, Adv., Mr. Dipankar Das Gupta, Adv., Mr. Arindam Chattopadhyay, Adv., Mr. Suman Dey, Adv., Mr. Mrinal Kanti Ghosh, Adv., Mr. Ranjan Saha, Adv., Mr. Sagnik Chatterjee, Adv., Mr. Supriyo Chattopadhyay, Adv., Ms. Sayantanee Bhattacharjee, Adv., Ms. Iti Dutta, Adv., Mr. Raja Saha, Adv., Mr. Avishek Prasad, Adv., Mr. Arka Kumar Nag, Adv., Mr. Sudipto Panda, Adv., Ms. Munmun Tewary, Adv., Mr. Himadri Sekhar Chakraborty, Adv., Ms. Tapati Samanta, Adv., Mr. Gausul Alam, Adv., Mr. Md. Yusuf Ali, Adv., Mr. Arjun Roy Mukherjee, Adv., Ms. Chaitali Bhattacharya, Adv., Ms. Ranjana Har Chowdhury, Adv., Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharya, Adv., Mr. Shamim Ul-Bari, Adv., Mr. Sanjib Das, Adv., Mr. Manas Kundu, Adv., Mr. Debabrata Mondal, Adv., Mr. Biswajit Dey, Adv., Ms. Rajlakhsmi Ghatak, Adv., Mr. Somnath Naskar, Adv., Mr. Subrata Ghosh, Adv., Ms. Neelam Singh, Adv., Mr. Bibekanand Tripathi, Adv., Mr. Tapas Kumar Mondal, Adv., Mr. Rama Prasad Sarkar, Adv., Ms. Anita Deb Jana, Adv., Ms. Manika Pandit, Adv., Ms. Jhuma Chakraborty, Adv., Mr. Aritra Ghosh, Adv., Mr. Saptak Sanyal, Adv., Mr. Panna Lal Bandyopadhyay, Adv., Mr. Rajarshi Basu, Adv., Mr. Shehnaz Tareq Mina, Adv., Ms. Sayantanee Bhattacharjee, Adv., Mr. Amartya Pal, Adv., Mr. Anwari Quraishi, Adv., Mr. Zainab Tahur, Adv., Mr. Parikshit Goswami, Adv., Ms. Lipika Chatterjee, Adv.,
For the SSC : Dr. Sutanu Kumar Patra, Adv., Mr. Kanak Kiran Bandopadhyay, Adv., Ms. Debalina Chakraborty, Adv., Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy, Adv., Ms. Supriya Dubey, Adv., Mr. Sourav Mitra, Adv.,
For the WBBSE: Mr. Santanu Kumar Mitra, Adv., Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharya, Adv.,
For the WBCSSC: Dr. Sutanu Kumar Patra, Adv., Mr. Sourav Mitra, Adv., Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy, Adv., Ms. Supriya Dubey, Adv., Mr. Kanak Kiran Bandyopadhyay, Adv., Ms. Debalina Chakraborty, Adv.,

Headnote:(A) West Bengal School Service Commission Act, 1997 - Section 10C - Constitutional validity - Teacher transfers from one school to another for the purpose of ensuring quality education questioned by teachers in aided schools. The court addressed the constitutionality of the changes imposed by Section 10C, arguing it does not detract from protections in Section 10 of the Act, as it evolved from earlier legislative frameworks to promote educational standards and pupil-teacher ratios, while safeguarding existing rights of previously appointed teachers. (Paras 1-103)

(B) Legal nature of employment - Recognition of the employment nature of teaching positions held in government-aided institutions reveals a regulatory mechanism set by the state. The legislature retains power to control and manage conditions concerning employment in educational institutions through amendments. (Paras 68-79)

(C) Legislative competence - The Act as amended does not violate fundamental rights; it is within the legislative competence to regulate public employment in aided schools. Any legislative change should prioritize public interests and educational objectives while preserving core protections for employees. (Paras 85-102)

JUDGMENT :

Harish Tandon, J.:

The slew of litigations which are assigned to this Bench relate to the Constitutional validity of the provisions contained under Section 10C of the WEST BENGAL SCHOOL SERVICE COMMISSION ACT , 1997 (said Act) at the behest of the teachers appointed in a different aided school within the State assailing the order of transfer or placement of service from one school to another school. Taking aid of Section 10C of the said Act, the School Service Commission recommended the transfer of a teacher from a school to another school on the basis of the general or special order passed by the State Government necessitated in the interest of the education and/or in the interest of Public Service but till date the recommendation has not fructified into an order of transfer or placement of service to another school. Since the constitutional validity of Section 10C of the said Act is assailed in all the aforesaid matters, the assignment was made to the Division Bench to decide the aforesaid issue.

2. All the counsels representing the respective writ petitioners have categorized their arguments in two compartments firstly, by introduction of Section 10 C of the Act, the legislatures have impinged upon the condition of service which has been protected under Section 10 of the said Act; secondly, the introduction of Section 10 C into the said Act by way of an amending Act cannot apply retrospectively as it has a larger impact on varying the condition of service to their disadvantages.

3. Since the second question is intricately related to the first question, we decided to permit the respective counsels to argue the said point and for the larger interest of the teachers within the State of West Bengal, proceeded to decide the aforesaid point as well in the event the first question is answered in favour of the writ petitioners.

4. A prelude to promulgation of the said Act is required to be recapitulated in order to understand the object and purpose for which the same was enacted. Since the time immemorial the education was always considered to be an important tool of learning, excellence and shaping the moral, ethical, cultural and political life; above all building the character and maintenance of a social fabric engrained into the society and ability to take a decision in various spheres of life having an impact on the development of the country socially, economically, politically and culturally. Since the time immemorial there was an establishment the informal system of education though regarded as a most powerful tool of imparting education in early development of this country so that the citizenry of the princely State to play a very important role in a decision making process and above all rendering justices to the common people through the monarch or the decision of a king. The king used to dispense justice with the council of Ministers who are always considered to be erudite, educated, knowledgeable and abreast of the miseries and follies of the citizen of the said State. The system of education developed gradually as it is dynamic in nature necessitated by the need of the people of the State and advancement of the society in all spheres of life. The education thus inculcate not only the sense of responsibility or obligation into a citizen of a country but have a tremendous impact on its structuring the orderly society and a discipline to be inculcated in them in a more organized manner uniformly. Even during the British Era, the educational institutions were set up by several philanthropist, educationalist, philosopher and the person having a resource both economically, politically to provide such education to the citizenry of the country without having any aid or grant from the then ruling Government. Several schools were set up by such philanthropist, educationalist and the resourceful person with the avowed object of providing education to the children considering their future and their tremendous contribution in

                                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                1
                                2
                                3
                                4
                                5
                                6
                                7
                                8
                                9
                                10
                                11
                                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                supreme today icon
                                logo-black

                                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                Please visit our Training & Support
                                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                qr

                                Scan Me!

                                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                whatsapp-icon Back to top