IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Tirthankar Ghosh, J.
Rakesh Ghosh & Anr. - Appellant
Vs.
The State of West Bengal - Respondent
C.R.A. 216 of 2019
Decided On : 01-08-2024
Counterfeit - IPC - 489B, 489C - The court discussed the mens rea requirement for offenses under Sections 489B and 489C of the IPC, emphasizing that mere possession of counterfeit currency is insufficient without proof of knowledge or intent to use it as genuine.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted for possessing counterfeit currency notes after a police raid. They were found with a total of 13 fake notes during the investigation initiated by a police complaint regarding illegal currency activities.
Finding of the Court:
The court upheld the trial court's conviction, finding that the prosecution had established the case against the appellants despite some witnesses turning hostile. The evidence presented was deemed sufficient to support the charges.
Issues: Whether the prosecution proved the mens rea required for conviction under Sections 489B and 489C of the IPC, and whether the appellants were wrongfully implicated due to political vendetta.
Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted that the mens rea is crucial for establishing guilt under Sections 489B and 489C, and the evidence presented was adequate to demonstrate the appellants' involvement in the offense.
Result: The sentence was reduced to the time already served by the appellants, who were deemed mere carriers of counterfeit notes.
JUDGMENT :
Tirthankar Ghosh, J.
The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment and sentence dated 18.02.2019 and 19.02.2019 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Krishnagar in Sessions Trial No.3(10)/2018 arising out of Sessions Case No.274(9)2018, thereby convicting the appellants under Section 489C of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for four years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- i.d. to suffer S.I. for two months each.
2. The genesis of the case was on the basis of a complaint which has been submitted by Prokash Kr. Guha, Sub-Inspector of Police, attached to Kotwali P.S., Nadia with the Inspector-in-Charge Kotwali Police Station, Nadia, subsequent to which, Kotwali Police Station Case No.161 dated 06.05.2018 was registered for investigation under Sections 489B/489C of the Indian Penal Code. The allegations, as was made before the Inspector-in-Charge, were to the effect that on 06.05.2018 while the informant namely, Prokash Kr. Guha, S.I. of Police was performing his evening duty, he received information that illegal procurement and transportation of fake Indian currency notes may take place near Java Petrol Pump within the aforesaid police station. The informant communicated with the Inspector-in-Charge Kotwali Police Station and as per direction proceeded to work out on the information along with one constable and civic volunteer force. On reaching Java Petrol Pump in and around Lokenath hotel in front of Java Petrol Pump, they noticed that two persons were standing at Lokenath hotel. On being identified the raiding team became alert and followed them. The persons were detained and the raiding team disclosed their identity. Two persons being passersby were called and the detained persons were requested to search them. Thereafter search was carried on Sangram Sikdar @ Luchi and Rakesh Ghosh and after search, six FICN of denomination of Rs.2,000/- were recovered from the exclusive possession of Sangram Sikder and seven numbers of FICNs of denomination of Rs.2,000/- were recovered from Rakesh Ghosh. After seizure under proper seizure list and being signed by the witnesses and after compliance with the formalities, the accused persons were taken into custody and a request was advanced to the Inspector-in-Charge for registration of the case.
3. The investigation of the case was assigned by the Inspector-in-Charge to Sub-Inspector, Anup Kr. Samanta who investigated the case and after completion of investigation submitted charge-sheet being No.260 of 2018 dated 28.07.2018 under Sections 489B/489C of the Indian Penal Code before the jurisdictional court.
4. The case was thereafter committed to the court of sessions and subsequently the records were transmitted to the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Krishnagar. The learned trial court was pleased to frame charges against the present appellants on 6th October, 2018 under Sections 489B & 489C of the Indian Penal Code. The contents of the charges were read over to the accused/appellants to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
5. The prosecution in order to prove its case relied upon seven witnesses which included PW-1, Prokash Kr. Guha, informant/S.I. attached to Kotwali Police Station; PW-2, Dayamoy Mukherjee, Constable and member of raiding party; PW-3, Mahadeb Das, Civic Volunteer and member of raiding party; PW- 4, Gorachand Adhikary @ Babulal, seizure list witness; PW-5, Swarajit Halder @ Chattu, seizure list witness; PW-6, Anup Kumar Samanta, S.I. attached to Kotwali Police Station and investigating officer of the case; PW-7, Sk. Ramesh, Manager Production in Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran (P) Limited, Salboni.
6. The prosecution in order to prove its case also relied upon number of documents which were marked as Exhibits which included the seizure list dated 06.05.2018 being exhibit-1; typed complaint, exhibit-2; memo of arrest of Sangram Sikdar @ Luch
Umashanker vs. State of Chhattisgarh reported in (2002) SCC (Cri) 758
Mammutti vs. State of Karnataka (1979) 4 SCC 723 : 1980 SCC (Cri) 170 : AIR 1979 SC 1705
The judgment clarifies that possession of counterfeit currency requires proof of knowledge or intent to use it as genuine for a conviction under IPC Sections 489B and 489C.
The court established that mere possession of counterfeit currency does not equate to being the mastermind behind the crime, warranting a reconsideration of sentencing.
The judgment clarifies that mere possession of counterfeit currency does not equate to being a mastermind, and the role of the accused must be considered in sentencing.
Possession of forged or counterfeit currency-notes or bank-notes - Conviction modified - Prosecution prove charges under S. 489C of IPC. As far as charges of S. 489B of IPC prosecution could neither ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove mens rea and the possession and use of counterfeit notes beyond reasonable doubt in cases involving offences under Sect....
Criminal Law – Using as genuine, forged or counterfeit currency notes or bank notes – Appeal against conviction – Testimony of witnesses – Reliability of - Minor contradictions, inconsistencies, embe....
Possession of counterfeit currency established through circumstantial evidence, while ownership of the recovery site remains unproven; conviction upheld with modified sentence considering age and del....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.