TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Minurani Maity – Appellant
Versus
Nibedita Das – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) :
1. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 19.05.2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 2nd Court, Tamluk in C.R. Case No. 331 of 2006 corresponding to T.R. Case No. 573/2006 wherein the learned Trial Court was pleased to acquit the accused persons from the charges under Section 447/379/427/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The genesis of the case relates to a complaint case being CR Case No. 331 of 2006 which was initiated at the instance of the appellant/complainant namely, Minurani Maity against Nibedita Das, Anupam Kumar Bose, Manas Paul, Pranab Kumar Paul and other unknown four/five masons and labourers and 10/12 localites. The allegations made in the petition of complaint were to the effect that the accused persons are neighbours who are mischievous and are engaged in hooliganism. The property of the complainant is situated within the jurisdiction of Tamluk Police Station at Daharpur Mouja and D.S. & R.S. Khatiyan No. 65, L.R. No. 245/5, Dag No. 397. It has been contended that she purchased 6 decimals of land out of the 14 decimals of land in the aforesaid Dag number and within the sai
Chikkarangaiah & Ors. –Vs. – State of Karnataka
Sanwat Singh v. State of Rajasthan
State of U.P. v. Krishna Gopal
Ajit Savant Majagvai v. State of Karnataka
C.K. Dasegowda & Ors. –Vs. – State of Karnataka
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka
Harijana Thirupala v. Public Prosecutor
Alamelu & Anr. –Vs. – State represented by Inspector of Police
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.