JUDGMENT :

(Debangsu Basak, J.) :

1. Alleged contemnor as the review applicant has applied for review of specific portion of the order dated July 18, 2024.

2. Review applicant has appeared in person. He has contended that, review of an order is permissible when, there is an error apparent on the face of the record. According to him applying wrong law is an error on face of the record and can be corrected on review. In support of such contention he has relied upon 2024 INSC 424 (Karnail Singh vs. State of Haryana & Ors.).

3. Review applicant has drawn the attention of the Court to the order under review dated July 18, 2014. He has contended that, a Contempt Rule had been issued by the learned Single Judge on its own motion as against him. In response to such Contempt Rule, he had appeared before the Division Bench on July 18, 2024 when the order under review was passed. He has contended that, he is seeking review of paragraphs 9, 10 and 11 of the order under review. He has contended that, although the order under review permitted him to use an affidavit in response to the Rule, such order also directed him to make over a copy of such affidavit to the other parties to the proceedings